Comparison of 7-site skinfold measurement and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating body fat percentage and regional adiposity in Taiwanese diabetic patients
Open Access
- 24 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 15 (7) , e0236323
Abstract
Obesity and regional adiposity are important risk factors for cardiometabolic disorders. The aim of this study is to compare 7-site skinfold (SF) measurement to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference method for estimating body fat percentage (BF%) and regional adiposity in diabetic outpatients. A total of 59 diabetic patients (36 females and 23 males) aged 28.5–78 years (median 67.7 years) with BMI 18.8–40.6 kg/m2 (median: 25.5 kg/m2) were enrolled. 7-site skinfold measurement and DXA were performed at the same visit day and biochemistry data were collected. Our results demonstrate the BF% calculated via Jackson & Pollock 7-site skinfold equation presents a strong correlation (r = 0.672, p < 0.001 in females; r = 0.885, p < 0.001 in males) with that measured by DXA, but the means of BF% between these two methods are significantly different in both sexes (paired t-test, p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman analysis showed the mean differences (DXA-SF) of BF% were positive for female (8.74%) and male (7.22%), suggesting Jackson & Pollock 7-site skinfold equation tends to underestimate the BF%. Besides, regional SF thicknesses of 7-site skinfold measurement were significantly correlated with the matched regional adiposity quantified by DXA. Furthermore, truncal and android SF thicknesses were notably positively correlated with several cardiometabolic risk factors in gender-specific manner. Our data indicate the 7-site skinfold measurement is not an interchangeable method for precisely measuring BF%, but might be practical for evaluating the cardiometabolic risks in Taiwanese diabetic outpatients.Keywords
Funding Information
- Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH-C106-006-S01, TSGH-C106-006-S02, TSGH-C106-007-S01, TSGH-C106-161, TSGH-C107-005-007-S05, TSGH-C107-007-007-S01, TSGH-C107-006-006-S02, TSGH-C108-006-007-007-S01, TSGH-C108-005-006-006-S01, TSGH-C108-005-006-006-S02, TSGH-C04-109030, MAB-106-008, MAB-106-113, MAB-107-063, MAB-108-045, MAB-108-046)
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 105-2314-B-016 -040 -MY3, MOST 107-2314-B-016-007, MOST 108-2314-B-016-013, MOST 108-2314-B-016 -033 -MY2, MOST 108-2314-B-016 -019 -MY3)
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adiposity Measurements by BMI, Skinfolds and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in relation to Risk Markers for Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes in Adult MalesDisease Markers, 2013
- Comparability of skinfold thickness to DXA whole-body total fat in their associations with serum triglycerides in youthsEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2012
- Regional Adiposity, Adipokines, and Insulin Resistance in Type 2 DiabetesDiabetes & Metabolism Journal, 2012
- Gender differences in insulin resistance, body composition, and energy balanceGender Medicine, 2009
- Developmental Origin of Fat: Tracking Obesity to Its SourceCell, 2007
- Superiority of skinfold measurements and waist over waist-to-hip ratio for determination of body fat distribution in a population-based cohort of Caucasian Dutch adultsEuropean Journal of Endocrinology, 2007
- Insulin‐associated weight gain in diabetes – causes, effects and coping strategiesDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2006
- The relation of body fat distribution, as assessed by six girth measurements, to diabetes mellitus in women.American Journal of Public Health, 1989
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 YearsBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1974