Species richness in North Atlantic fish: Process concealed by pattern
Authors:
- Henrik GislasonHGHenrik Gislason
- Jeremy S. CollieJCJeremy S. Collie
- Brian R. MacKenzieBMBrian R. MacKenzie
- Anders NielsenANAnders Nielsen
- Maria de Fátima BorgesMBMaria de Fátima Borges
- Teresa BottariTBTeresa Bottari
- Corina ChavesCCCorina Chaves
- Andrey V. DolgovADAndrey V. Dolgov
- Jakov DulčićJDJakov Dulčić
- Daniel E. DupliseaDDDaniel E. Duplisea
- Heino O. FockHFHeino O. Fock
- Didier GascuelDGDidier Gascuel
Open Access
- 29 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Global Ecology and Biogeography
- Vol. 29 (5) , 842-856
Abstract
Aim: Previous analyses of marine fish species richness based on presence‐absence data have shown changes with latitude and average species size, but little is known about the underlying processes. To elucidate these processes we use metabolic, neutral and descriptive statistical models to analyse how richness responds to maximum species length, fish abundance, temperature, primary production, depth, latitude and longitude, while accounting for differences in species catchability, sampling effort and mesh size.Data: Results from 53,382 bottom trawl hauls representing 50 fish assemblages.Location: The northern Atlantic from Nova Scotia to Guinea.Time period: 1977–2013.Methods: A descriptive generalized additive model was used to identify functional relationships between species richness and potential drivers, after which nonlinear estimation techniques were used to parameterize: (a) a ‘best’ fitting model of species richness built on the functional relationships, (b) an environmental model based on latitude, longitude and depth, and mechanistic models based on (c) metabolic and (d) neutral theory.Results: In the ‘best’ model the number of species observed is a lognormal function of maximum species length. It increases significantly with temperature, primary production, sampling effort, and abundance, and declines with depth and, for small species, with the mesh size in the trawl. The ‘best’ model explains close to 90% of the deviance and the neutral, metabolic and environmental models 89%. In all four models, maximum species length and either temperature or latitude account for more than half of the deviance explained.Main conclusions: The two mechanistic models explain the patterns in demersal fish species richness in the northern Atlantic almost equally well. A better understanding of the underlying drivers is likely to require development of dynamic mechanistic models of richness and size evolution, fit not only to extant distributions, but also to historical environmental conditions and to past speciation and extinction rates.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- marmap: A Package for Importing, Plotting and Analyzing Bathymetric and Topographic Data in RPLOS ONE, 2013
- Does fish larval dispersal differ between high and low latitudes?Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2013
- Extinction Risk and Overfishing: Reconciling Conservation and Fisheries Perspectives on the Status of Marine FishesScientific Reports, 2012
- Thermal energy and the rate of genetic evolution in marine fishesEvolutionary Ecology, 2010
- The completeness of taxonomic inventories for describing the global diversity and distribution of marine fishesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007
- How Dispersal Limitation Shapes Species–Body Size Distributions in Local CommunitiesThe American Naturalist, 2004
- EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR AN OPTIMAL BODY SIZE IN SNAKESEvolution, 2003
- Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richnessEcology Letters, 2001
- Insect species diversity, abundance and body size relationshipsNature, 1996
- Patterns in species richness, size, and latitudinal range of East Atlantic fishesEcography, 1994