Do peer reviewers comment on reporting items as instructed by the journal? A secondary analysis of two randomized trials

This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:

• Do reviewers get their deserved acknowledgments from the authors of manuscripts?
  Scientometrics, 2023
• Reminding Peer Reviewers of Reporting Guideline Items to Improve Completeness in Published Articles
  JAMA Network Open, 2023
• Reporting quality of clinical trial protocols: a repeated cross-sectional study about the Adherence to SPIrit Recommendations in Switzerland, CAnada and GErmany (ASPIRE-SCAGE)
  BMJ Open, 2022
• Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
  BMJ Open, 2020
• The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners
  Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2019
• A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network
  Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2016
• Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study
  BMJ, 2014
• Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
  BMC Medicine, 2010
• CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
  BMJ, 2010
• A Proposal for Structured Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials
  JAMA, 1994