Prognostic Factors Influencing Progression-Free Survival Determined From a Series of Sporadic Desmoid Tumors: A Wait-and-See Policy According to Tumor Presentation
Authors:
- Sébastien SalasSSSébastien Salas
- Armelle DufresneADArmelle Dufresne
- Binh BuiBBBinh Bui
- Jean-Yves BlayJBJean-Yves Blay
- Philippe TerrierPTPhilippe Terrier
- Dominique Ranchere-VinceDRDominique Ranchere-Vince
- Sylvie BonvalotSBSylvie Bonvalot
- Eberhard StoeckleESEberhard Stoeckle
- Louis GuillouLGLouis Guillou
- Axel Le CesneACAxel Le Cesne
- Odile OberlinOOOdile Oberlin
- Véronique BrousteVBVéronique Brouste
Top Cited Papers
- 10 September 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 29 (26) , 3553-3558
Abstract
Purpose Desmoid tumors are mesenchymal fibroblastic/myofibroblastic proliferations with locoregional aggressiveness and high ability to recur after initial treatment. We present the results of the largest series of sporadic desmoid tumors ever published to determine the prognostic factors of these rare tumors. Patients and Methods Four hundred twenty-six patients with a desmoid tumor at diagnosis were included, and the following parameters were studied: age, sex, delay between first symptoms and diagnosis, tumor size, tumor site, previous history of surgery or trauma in the area of the primary tumor, surgical margins, and context of abdominal wall desmoids in women of child-bearing age during or shortly after pregnancy. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis for progression-free survival (PFS). Results In univariate analysis, age, tumor size, tumor site, and surgical margins (R2 v R0/R1) had a significant impact on PFS. PFS curves were not significantly different for microscopic assessment of surgical resection quality (R0 v R1). In multivariate analysis, age, tumor size, and tumor site had independent values. Three prognostic groups for PFS were defined on the basis of the number of independent unfavorable prognostic factors (0 or 1, 2, and 3). Conclusion This study clearly demonstrates that there are different prognostic subgroups of desmoid tumors that could benefit from different therapeutic strategies, including a wait-and-see policy.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Imatinib for progressive and recurrent aggressive fibromatosis (desmoid tumors): an FNCLCC/French Sarcoma Group phase II trial with a long-term follow-upAnnals of Oncology, 2010
- Prognostic factors in desmoid-type fibromatosis: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 46 casesPathology, 2010
- Prognostic factors for extra‐abdominal and abdominal wall desmoids: A 20‐year experience at a single institutionJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2009
- A critical analysis of treatment strategies in desmoid tumours: a review of a series of 106 casesEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2009
- Extra-abdominal primary fibromatosis: Aggressive management could be avoided in a subgroup of patientsEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2008
- Natural course of desmoid-type fibromatosisJournal of Orthopaedic Science, 2008
- Aggressive fibromatosis of the abdominal wall, limbs and limb girdlesBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Treatment of aggressive fibromatosis: A retrospective study of 72 patients followed for 1-27 yearsActa Orthopaedica, 2002
- Desmoid tumoursEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2001
- Surgical management of intra-abdominal desmoid tumoursBritish Journal of Surgery, 2000