Technical note: how to determine the FDG activity for tumour PET imaging that satisfies European guidelines
Open Access
- 29 September 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in EJNMMI Physics
- Vol. 3 (1) , 22
Abstract
For tumour imaging with PET, the literature proposes to administer a patient-specific FDG activity that depends quadratically on a patient’s body weight. However, a practical approach on how to implement such a protocol in clinical practice is currently lacking. We aimed to provide a practical method to determine a FDG activity formula for whole-body PET examinations that satisfies both the EANM guidelines and this quadratic relation. We have developed a methodology that results in a formula describing the patient-specific FDG activity to administer. A PET study using the NEMA NU-2001 image quality phantom forms the basis of our method. This phantom needs to be filled with 2.0 and 20.0 kBq FDG/mL in the background and spheres, respectively. After a PET acquisition of 10 min, a reconstruction has to be performed that results in sphere recovery coefficients (RCs) that are within the specifications as defined by the EANM Research Ltd (EARL). By performing reconstructions based on shorter scan durations, the minimal scan time per bed position (T min) needs to be extracted using an image coefficient of variation (COV) of 15 %. At T min, the RCs should be within EARL specifications as well. Finally, the FDG activity (in MBq) to administer can be described by A = c ⋅ w 2 ⋅ T min t $$ A=c \cdot {w}^2\cdot \frac{T_{\min }}{t} $$ with c a constant that is typically 0.0533 (MBq/kg2), w the patient’s body weight (in kg), and t the scan time per bed position that is chosen in a clinical setting (in seconds). We successfully demonstrated this methodology using a state-of-the-art PET/CT scanner. We provide a practical method that results in a formula describing the FDG activity to administer to individual patients for whole-body PET examinations, taking into account both the EANM guidelines and a quadratic relation between FDG activity and patient’s body weight. This formula is generally applicable to any PET system, using a specified image reconstruction and scan time per bed position.
Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving the Detection of Small Lesions Using a State-of-the-Art Time-of-Flight PET/CT System and Small-Voxel ReconstructionsJournal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 2015
- FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2014
- Clinical impact of time-of-flight and point response modeling in PET reconstructions: a lesion detection studyPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2013
- Properties of Noise in Positron Emission Tomography Images Reconstructed with Filtered-Backprojection and Row-Action Maximum Likelihood AlgorithmJournal of Digital Imaging, 2012
- FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2009
- Comparison of Imaging Protocols for 18F-FDG PET/CT in Overweight Patients: Optimizing Scan Duration Versus Administered DoseJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2009
- Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans.2005
- Optimizing imaging protocols for overweight and obese patients: a lutetium orthosilicate PET/CT study.2005
- Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study.2004
- Optimal dose of 18 F-FDG required for whole-body PET using an LSO PET cameraEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2003