Mesonet‐Based Ground Validation of IMERG‐V07 and GSMaP‐V08 Over a Semi‐Arid Dryland Ecosystem in West Texas
Open Access
- 28 July 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Vol. 131 (14)
Abstract
Climate change has caused highly uncertain precipitation regimes and associated hydrometeorological hazards over global drylands. Accurate precipitation measurements are vital for monitoring dryland ecohydrology. Satellite precipitation products (SPPs), including the Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrievals for GPM (Global Precipitation Measurement) (IMERG‐V07) and the Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP‐V08), provide quasi‐global coverage but require regional‐scale ground validation to assess errors and reliability, over drylands. We evaluated IMERG‐V07 and GSMaP‐V08 using measurements from 107 West Texas Mesonet (WTM) sites from 2018 to 2022. Precipitation over the semi‐arid WTM domain is concentrated during the May–October wet season. The observed southeast–to‐northwest precipitation gradient (i.e., higher to lower) exists primarily due to dryline‐induced convergence and orographic lifting. At monthly scale, IMERG (GSMaP) overestimates (underestimates), with GSMaP demonstrating greater overall accuracy. SPPs perform best during the peak precipitation months (May, September, and October) and reproduce interannual fluctuations well. The GSMaP performs better on monthly and annual timescales. The mean bootstrap 95% confidence interval for correlation coefficient were [0.759, 0.825] and [0.837, 0.892] for IMERG and GSMaP, respectively. Monthly accumulations of SPPs exhibit intensity dependent biases in high‐intensity precipitation regimes. For near‐real‐time (NRT) detection of extreme precipitation, IMERG‐Early shows higher sensitivity via higher detection but also more false alarms. The GSMaP‐NRT provides balanced event detection, with lower false alarms and higher critical success index in most cases. However, the GSMaP reliability‐flag and IMERG quality‐index were also found to be decisive factors. Results highlight the need for intensity‐ and timescale‐sensitive validation to improve SPP algorithms for advanced precipitation monitoring and forecasting over drylands.Keywords
Funding Information
- Earth Sciences Division (80NSSC22K1786)
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modeling and managing flash flood hazards in the state of Kuwait: a hydrogeomorphological study2024
- The Goddard Profiling (GPROF) Precipitation Retrieval Algorithm2020
- Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP) Products in the GPM Era2020
- To What Extent is the Day 1 GPM IMERG Satellite Precipitation Estimate Improved as Compared to TRMM TMPA‐RT?Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2018
- Comprehensive evaluation of multisatellite precipitation estimates over India using gridded rainfall dataJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2015
- Global precipitation measurementMeteorological Applications, 2011
- A Tool to Estimate Land‐Surface Emissivities at Microwave frequencies (TELSEM) for use in numerical weather predictionQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2011
- Observation of convection initiation processes with a suite of state‐of‐the‐art research instruments during COPS IOP 8bQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2011
- The Convective and Orographically‐induced Precipitation Study (COPS): the scientific strategy, the field phase, and research highlightsQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2011
- Satellite rainfall climatology: a reviewInternational Journal of Climatology, 2001