Founder effects, post-introduction evolution and phenotypic plasticity contribute to invasion success of a genetically impoverished invader
- 2 December 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 192 (1) , 105-118
Abstract
Multiple mechanisms may act synergistically to promote success of invasive plants. Here, we tested the roles of three non-mutually exclusive mechanisms—founder effects, post-introduction evolution and phenotypic plasticity—in promoting invasion of Chromolaena odorata. We performed a common garden experiment to investigate phenotypic diversification and phenotypic plasticity of the genetically impoverished invader in response to two rainfall treatments (ambient and 50% rainfall). We used ancestor–descendant comparisons to determine post-introduction evolution and the QST-FST approach to estimate past selection on phenotypic traits. We found that eight traits differed significantly between plants from the invasive versus native ranges, for two of which founder effects can be inferred and for six of which post-introduction evolution can be inferred. The invader experienced strong diversifying selection in the invasive range and showed clinal variations in six traits along water and/or temperature gradients. These clinal variations are likely attributed to post-introduction evolution rather than multiple introductions of pre-adapted genotypes, as most of the clinal variations were absent or in opposite directions from those for native populations. Compared with populations, rainfall treatments explained only small proportions of total variations in all studied traits for plants from both ranges, highlighting the importance of heritable phenotypic differentiation. In addition, phenotypic plasticity was similar for plants from both ranges although neutral genetic diversity was much lower for plants from the invasive range. Our results showed that founder effects, post-introduction evolution and phenotypic plasticity may function synergistically in promoting invasion success of C. odorata.Keywords
Funding Information
- The National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1200101, 2016YFC1201100)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31500463, 31470575, 31670545, 31270582)
- the China Scholarship Council (201504910498)
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differences in Competitive Ability between Plants from Nonnative and Native Populations of a Tropical Invader Relates to Adaptive Responses in Abiotic and Biotic EnvironmentsPLOS ONE, 2013
- Invasion Success in a Marginal Habitat: An Experimental Test of Competitive Ability and Drought Tolerance in Chromolaena odorataPLOS ONE, 2013
- Meta‐analysis reveals evolution in invasive plant species but little support for Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (EICA)Ecology and Evolution, 2013
- Nested by design: model fitting and interpretation in a mixed model eraMethods in Ecology and Evolution, 2012
- Exploring the likelihood and mechanism of a climate-change-induced dieback of the Amazon rainforestProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Allocation of vegetation biomass across a climate-related gradient in the grasslands of Inner MongoliaJournal of Arid Environments, 2009
- Establishment of parallel altitudinal clines in traits of native and introduced forbsEcology, 2009
- Evolutionary tradeoffs for nitrogen allocation to photosynthesis versus cell walls in an invasive plantProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Different gardens, different results: native and introduced populations exhibit contrasting phenotypes across common gardensOecologia, 2008
- Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populationsOecologia, 2005