Drivers of Precipitation Change: An Energetic Understanding
Open Access
- 1 December 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Climate
- Vol. 31 (23) , 9641-9657
Abstract
The response of the hydrological cycle to climate forcings can be understood within the atmospheric energy budget framework. In this study precipitation and energy budget responses to five forcing agents are analyzed using 10 climate models from the Precipitation Driver Response Model Intercomparison Project (PDRMIP). Precipitation changes are split into a forcing-dependent fast response and a temperature-driven hydrological sensitivity. Globally, when normalized by top-of-atmosphere (TOA) forcing, fast precipitation changes are most sensitive to strongly absorbing drivers (CO 2 , black carbon). However, over land fast precipitation changes are most sensitive to weakly absorbing drivers (sulfate, solar) and are linked to rapid circulation changes. Despite this, land-mean fast responses to CO 2 and black carbon exhibit more intermodel spread. Globally, the hydrological sensitivity is consistent across forcings, mainly associated with increased longwave cooling, which is highly correlated with intermodel spread. The land-mean hydrological sensitivity is weaker, consistent with limited moisture availability. The PDRMIP results are used to construct a simple model for land-mean and sea-mean precipitation change based on sea surface temperature change and TOA forcing. The model matches well with CMIP5 ensemble mean historical and future projections, and is used to understand the contributions of different drivers. During the twentieth century, temperature-driven intensification of land-mean precipitation has been masked by fast precipitation responses to anthropogenic sulfate and volcanic forcing, consistent with the small observed trend. However, as projected sulfate forcing decreases, and warming continues, land-mean precipitation is expected to increase more rapidly, and may become clearly observable by the mid-twenty-first century.Keywords
Funding Information
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/K007483/1)
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/K006038/1)
- Newton Fund
- Met Office (NE/K007483/1)
- Norges Forskningsråd (229778)
- Ministry of the Environment (JP15H01728)
- Ministry of the Environment (JP15K12190)
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/K500872/1)
- Norges Forskningsråd (229771)
- Norges Forskningsråd (207711/E10)
- Norges Forskningsråd (nn2345k)
- Norges Forskningsråd (ns2345k)
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Jury is still out on the radiative forcing by black carbonProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016
- Ensemble flood risk assessment in Europe under high end climate scenariosGlobal Environmental Change, 2015
- The Response of Precipitation Minus Evapotranspiration to Climate Warming: Why the “Wet-Get-Wetter, Dry-Get-Drier” Scaling Does Not Hold over Land*Journal of Climate, 2015
- Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessmentJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2013
- Robust direct effect of carbon dioxide on tropical circulation and regional precipitationNature Geoscience, 2013
- A description of the global land-surface precipitation data products of the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre with sample applications including centennial (trend) analysis from 1901–presentEarth System Science Data, 2013
- Precipitation, radiative forcing and global temperature changeGeophysical Research Letters, 2010
- A regional and global analysis of carbon dioxide physiological forcing and its impact on climateClimate Dynamics, 2010
- Fast versus slow response in climate change: implications for the global hydrological cycleClimate Dynamics, 2009
- Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycleNature, 2002