The Object of Activity: Making Sense of the Sense-Maker
Author:
- Victor KaptelininVKVictor Kaptelinin
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Mind, Culture, and Activity
- Vol. 12 (1) , 4-18
Abstract
The concept of "the object of activity" plays a key role in research based on activity theory. However, the usefulness of this concept is somewhat undermined by the fact that a number of problems related to its meaning and its contexts of use remain unsolved. This article is an attempt to address some of these problems. The article focuses on 3 potential sources of uncertainties and inconsistencies, which may be obstacles to a more fruitful application of the concept of the object of activity in both research and practice. The first source is difficulties related to translation of ideas, originally formulated by Leontiev (1959/1981) in Russian, into English. The second source is different interpretations of the concept of the object of activity within two contemporary approaches in activity theory, the one developed by Leontiev (1975/1978) and the one developed by Engestrom (1987). Finally, the article finds the original Leontiev (1975/1978) definition of the object of activity as "its true motive" proble...Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pursuing an Evolving Object: A Case Study in Object Formation and IdentificationMind, Culture, and Activity, 2002
- Activity theory and individual and social transformation1999
- Introduction1999
- The riddle of things: Activity theory and actor‐network theory as approaches to studying innovationsMind, Culture, and Activity, 1999
- The Role of the Principle of Object-relatedness in the Theory of ActivityJournal of Russian & East European Psychology, 1995