Fears, Uncertainties, and Hopes: Patient-Initiated Actions and Doctors’ Responses During Oncology Interviews
Authors:
- 2 July 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Health Communication
- Vol. 20 (11) , 1243-1254
Abstract
New cancer patients frequently raise concerns about fears, uncertainties, and hopes during oncology interviews. This study sought to understand when and how patients raise their concerns, how doctors responded to these patient-initiated actions, and implications for communication satisfaction. A subsampling of video recorded and transcribed encounters was investigated involving 44 new patients and 14 oncologists. Patients completed pre/post self-report measures about fears, uncertainties, and hopes as well as postevaluations of interview satisfaction. Conversation analysis was used to initially identify pairs of patient-initiated and doctor-responsive actions. A coding scheme was subsequently developed, and two independent coding teams, comprised of two coders each, reliably identified patient-initiated and doctor-responsive social actions. Interactional findings reveal that new cancer patients initiate actions much more frequently than previous research had identified, concerns are usually raised indirectly, and with minimal emotion. Doctors tend to respond to these concerns immediately, but with even less affect, and rarely partner with patients. From pre/post results, it was determined that the higher patients’ reported fears, the higher their postvisit fears and lower their satisfaction. Patients with high uncertainty were highly proactive (e.g., asked more questions), yet reported even greater uncertainties after encounters. Hopeful patients also exited interviews with high hopes. Overall, new patients were very satisfied: oncology interviews significantly decreased patients’ fears and uncertainties, while increasing hopes. Discussion raises key issues for improving communication and managing quality cancer care.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Cancer Institute ((CA122472))
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients' Efforts to Justify Wellness in a Comprehensive Cancer ClinicHealth Communication, 2013
- A Comprehensive Observational Coding Scheme for Analyzing Instrumental, Affective, and Relational Communication in Health Care ContextsJournal of Health Communication, 2011
- An evidence base for patient-centered cancer care: A meta-analysis of studies of observed communication between cancer specialists and their patientsPatient Education and Counseling, 2009
- Negative emotions in cancer care: Do oncologists’ responses depend on severity and type of emotion?Patient Education and Counseling, 2009
- Physicians’ opening questions and patients’ satisfactionPatient Education and Counseling, 2006
- Breaking the sequential mold: Answering ‘more than the question’ during comprehensive history takingText & Talk, 2001
- The enduring and evolving nature of the patient–physician relationshipPatient Education and Counseling, 2000
- Helping health professionals involved in cancer care acquire key interviewing skills—the impact of workshopsEuropean Journal of Cancer, 1996
- Doctor-patient interactions in oncologySocial Science & Medicine, 1996
- Delay versus help seeking for breast cancer symptoms: A critical review of the literature on patient and provider delaySocial Science & Medicine, 1993