Investor Heterogeneity in Preferences for AI-Based Financial Services: Evidence from Japanese Online Investors
Open Access
Abstract
This study examines investor heterogeneity in relative priorities for AI-based financial services using a large-scale survey of Japanese online investors. We use data from the 2026 wave of the “Survey on Life and Money,” administered by Rakuten Securities and Kadoya Lab at Hiroshima University. The final analytical sample comprises 14,432 respondents. Respondents selected their first-, second-, and third-preferred AI-based services from 11 options, which were grouped into five functional categories: administrative procedure proxy services, consultation for troubles and emergencies, education and literacy support, information provision and planning support, and advisory and management for investment. Because respondents were required to select their top three preferred services, the dependent variables capture relative priorities rather than absolute willingness to use AI services. Binary probit and ordered probit models show that investor characteristics are associated with relative priorities across service categories, although the estimated marginal effects are generally modest. Information provision and planning support is more strongly prioritized by male respondents, more-educated respondents, and those with greater household financial assets. Advisory and management services are more strongly prioritized by higher-income and more impatient respondents, while risk aversion is negatively associated with this category. Additional robustness checks suggest that these patterns are not explained entirely by unequal category sizes, although option-level results reveal some within-category heterogeneity. These findings suggest that AI-based financial services should reflect investor heterogeneity while recognizing that service categories may contain diverse underlying functions.Keywords
Funding Information
- Rakuten Securities
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP23K25534)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP24K21417)
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regulatory and Compliance Issues in AI-Driven Financial Services2026
- Drivers of robo-advisors adoption in financial services: a meta-analytical studyInternational Journal of Bank Marketing, 2025
- The role of robo-advisors in behavioural finance, shaping investment decisionsCogent Economics & Finance, 2025
- Behavioral biases and Fintech adoption: Investigating the role of financial literacyActa Psychologica, 2025
- AI integration in financial services: a systematic review of trends and regulatory challengesHumanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2025
- Artificial intelligence, financial services knowledge, government support, and user innovativeness: Exploring the moderated-mediated path to fintech adoptionHeliyon, 2024
- Portfolio management with the help of AI: What drives retail Indian investors to robo‐advisors?The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 2024
- An effective role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in banking sectorMeasurement: Sensors, 2024
- Behavioural finance in an era of artificial intelligence: Longitudinal case study of robo-advisors in investment decisionsJournal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 2020
- Hyperbolic discounting, the sign effect, and the body mass indexJournal of Health Economics, 2010