Enablers and barriers to the implementation of Multisystemic Therapy for Child Abuse and Neglect (MST-CAN) into the routine delivery of child protection services in New South Wales, Australia
Authors:
- George EconomidisGEGeorge Economidis
- Sara FarnbachSFSara Farnbach
- Anne-Marie EadesAEAnne-Marie Eades
- Kathleen FalsterKFKathleen Falster
- Anthony ShakeshaftASAnthony Shakeshaft
Open Access
- 31 October 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Children and Youth Services Review
- Vol. 155
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre
- University of New South Wales
- Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR)Implementation Science, 2013
- The economic burden of child maltreatment in the United States and implications for preventionChild Abuse & Neglect, 2012
- Qualitative data analysis: the framework approachNurse Researcher, 2011
- New directions in the treatment of child physical abuse and neglect in Australia: MST-CAN, a case studyAdvances in Mental Health, 2010
- Multisystemic therapy for child abuse and neglect: A randomized effectiveness trial.Journal of Family Psychology, 2010
- Outcome indicators in palliative care—how to assess quality and success. Focus group and nominal group technique in GermanySupportive Care in Cancer, 2009
- Preventing Crime with Prenatal and Infancy Support of Parents: The Nurse-Family PartnershipVictims & Offenders, 2007
- Culturally Competent Family Interventions: Review and Case IllustrationsThe American Journal of Family Therapy, 2000
- Homebuilders and family preservationChildren and Youth Services Review, 1992
- The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies.American Journal of Public Health, 1972