Continuity Corrected Wilson Interval for the Difference of Two Independent Proportions
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 April 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications
- Vol. 22 (1-2) , 38-53
Abstract
Confidence interval for the difference of two proportions has been studied for decades. Many methods were developed to improve the approximation of the limiting distribution of test statistics, such as the profile likelihood method, the score method, and the Wilson method. For the Wilson interval developed by Beal (Biometrics 43:941, 1987), the approximation of the Z test statistic to the standard normal distribution may be further improved by utilizing the continuity correction, in the observation of anti-conservative intervals from the Wilson interval. We theoretically prove that the Wilson interval is nested in the continuity corrected Wilson interval under mild conditions. We compare the continuity corrected Wilson interval with the commonly used methods with regards to coverage probability, interval width, and mean squared error of coverage probability. The proposed interval has good performance in many configurations. An example from a Phase II cancer trial is used to illustrate the application of these methods.Keywords
Funding Information
- NIH (R03CA248006)
- NIH (R01 AG070849)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimal adaptive two‐stage designs for early phase II clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2015
- Improved Confidence Intervals for the Youden IndexPLOS ONE, 2015
- Exact approaches for testing non-inferiority or superiority of two incidence ratesStatistics & Probability Letters, 2014
- Bayesian credible intervals for binomial proportions in a single patient trialStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 2010
- Statistical Methods for Rates and ProportionsTechnometrics, 2004
- A quasi‐exact method for the confidence intervals of the difference of two independent binomial proportions in small sample casesStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Approximate Is Better than "Exact" for Interval Estimation of Binomial ProportionsThe American Statistician, 1998
- Comparative analysis of two ratesStatistics in Medicine, 1985
- Small-Sample Confidence Intervals forp1–p2andp1/p2in 2 × 2 Contingency TablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1980
- Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical InferenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1927