Inhibitory control test, critical flicker frequency, and psychometric tests in the diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
Open Access
- 1 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Medknow in Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
- Vol. 19 (1) , 40-4
Abstract
Background/Aim: Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) impairs health-related quality of life and driving ability of the patient. Objective: We assessed the utility of the inhibitory control test (ICT), critical flicker frequency (CFF), and psychometry in the diagnosis of MHE. Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with cirrhosis underwent number connection tests A and B (NCT-A, B), digit symbol test (DST), line tracing test (LTT), serial dot test (SDT), CFF, and ICT at baseline and after four hours. Fifty healthy subjects served as controls for the ICT test. Results: Fifty patients with cirrhosis (43.4 ± 10.2 yrs, M: F 42:8) underwent psychometric tests [NCT-A (48.3 ± 17.7 vs. 42.6 ± 17.3 sec, P = 0.001), NCT-B (85.7 ± 40.1 vs. 90.2 ± 37.0 sec, P = 0.18), DST (23.5 ± 9.3 vs. 23.0 ± 8.7, P = 0.45), LTT (96.6 ± 48.2 vs. 96.8 ± 46.8 sec, P = 0.92), SDT (88.0 ± 39.5 vs. 83.4 ± 37.2 sec, P = 0.02)] at baseline and after four hours. Target accuracy of ICT was lower in patients with cirrhosis compared with controls (88.4 ± 5.6 vs. 95.6 ± 2.1, P = 0.01), whereas ICT lures were higher (18.3 ± 4.2 vs 10.2 ± 2.8, P = 0.01). Patients with cirrhosis showed a reduction in lures in the second evaluation compared with the first (18.3 ± 4.2 vs. 17.1 ± 4.3, P = 0.003) but no change in target accuracy (88.4 ± 5.6 vs. 88.4 ± 5.3, P = 0.97). Control subjects did not show any change either in lures (10.2 ± 2.8 vs. 10.3 ± 2.1, P = 0.65) or target accuracy (95.6 ± 2.1 vs. 95.5 ± 2.2, P = 0.82). The sensitivity and specificity of ICT test for the diagnosis of MHE at lure rate >16.5 was 88.5 and 56%, respectively. CFF in patients with MHE (38.4 ± 1.8 vs. 38.6 ± 1.5, P = 0.3) and non MHE (40.6 ± 2.2 vs. 40.8 ± 2.2, P = 0.6) did not show any difference after four hours as in controls (41.9 ± 2.4 vs. 42.1 ± 2.0, P = 0.3). Thirty one (31%) patients preferred psychometric tests, 57 (57%) preferred CFF and only 12 (12%) preferred ICT ( P = 0.001). Conclusions: ICT, CFF, and psychometric tests are useful tools to assess MHE, and CFF was preferred by this study cohort.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Vehicle for Accidents and Traffic ViolationsAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2007
- Critical flicker frequency: Diagnostic tool for minimal hepatic encephalopathyJournal of Hepatology, 2007
- Lactulose improves cognitive functions and health-related quality of life in patients with cirrhosis who have minimal hepatic encephalopathyHepatology, 2007
- Testing for minimal hepatic encephalopathy in the United States: An AASLD surveyHepatology, 2007
- Minimal hepatic encephalopathy: diagnosis, clinical significance and recommendationsJournal of Hepatology, 2005
- Hepatic encephalopathy—Definition, nomenclature, diagnosis, and quantification: Final report of the Working Party at the 11th World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna, 1998Hepatology, 2002
- Subclinical hepatic encephalopathy predicts the development of overt hepatic encephalopathyAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2001
- Prevalence and natural history of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosisJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2001
- The prognostic significance of subclinical hepatic encephalopathyAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2000
- Clinical Features and Survivial of Cirrhotic Patients With Subclinical Cognitive Alterations Detected by the Number Connection Test and Computerized Psychometric TestsHepatology, 1999