The Incidence of Perioperative Hypersensitivity Reactions
Authors:
- Alberto LafuenteALAlberto Lafuente
- Gracia JavaloyesGJGracia Javaloyes
- Paula Cabrera-FreitagPCPaula Cabrera-Freitag
- Juan M. de la BorbollaJBJuan M. de la Borbolla
- Rafael MoncadaRMRafael Moncada
- Maria J. GoikoetxeaMGMaria J. Goikoetxea
- Maria L. SanzMSMaria L. Sanz
- Marta FerrerMFMarta Ferrer
- Gabriel GastaminzaGGGabriel Gastaminza
- 1 July 2015
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 121 (1) , 117-123
Abstract
Al anesthesia in our hospital, to establish the incidence of the allergic reactions for each drug used, to assess the frequency of IgE-mediated reactions in even mild reactions, and to compare the degree of agreement between anesthesiologist suspicion and allergy diagnosis. METHODS: We included patients diagnosed with a clinical hypersensitivity reaction during a procedure under general anesthesia over a 30-month period (February 2008 to August 2010). Plasma histamine and serum tryptase concentrations were determined in these patients. We performed skin tests to diagnose the causative agent. Data from the hospital electronic prescribing system were collected to determine the ratio of reactions for each drug. RESULTS: During the study period, 16,946 anesthetic procedures were performed (53% involved males; mean age, 51.6 years). Forty-four perianesthetic reactions were recorded, and the ratio of reactions was 1 in 385 operations (95% confidence interval, 1/529–1/287). Twenty-five reactions (25/44; 57%) occurred during the induction of anesthesia. Twenty-one reactions (21/44; 48%) were mild, involving only skin, and 23 of 44 (52%) were anaphylactic reactions. Four of 10 patients who had only a rash experienced IgE-mediated reactions. Five surgeries (11%) were suspended because of the severity of the reactions. Fifteen reactions (15/30; 50%) were IgE mediated, and, in 2 of 30 (7%), a non-IgE agent was found (cold urticaria and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug intolerance). The ratio of reactions for each drug was as follows: protamine, 1 in 468; cisatracurium, 1 in 1388; amoxicillin-clavulanate, 1 in 1968; atracurium, 1 in 2039; and dipyrone, 1 in 3159. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative reactions are more common than previously reported. Mild hypersensitivity perioperative reactions—involving only skin—should be considered in evaluating patients because a substantial number of these reactions are IgE mediated....Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The usefulness of plasma histamine and different tryptase cut‐off points in the diagnosis of peranaesthetic hypersensitivity reactionsClinical & Experimental Allergy, 2014
- Early skin testing is effective for diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions occurring during anesthesiaAllergy, 2013
- Hypersensitivity Reactions to Neuromuscular Blocking AgentsCurrent Pharmaceutical Design, 2008
- Systematic follow‐up increases incidence of anaphylaxis during adverse reactions in anesthetized patientsActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2007
- Anaphylaxis during Anesthesia in NorwayAnesthesiology, 2005
- Épidémiologie des réactions anaphylactoïdes peranesthésiques. Quatrième enquête multicentrique (juillet 1994–décembre 1996)Annales Françaises d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, 1999
- Muscle relaxants and histamine releaseActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1995
- The incidence and clinical features of anaphylactic reactions during anaesthesia in AustraliaAnnales Françaises d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, 1993
- INCIDENCE AND SEVERITY OF ANAPHYLACTOID REACTIONS TO COLLOID VOLUME SUBSTITUTESThe Lancet, 1977
- An automated continuous-flow system for the extraction and fluorometric analysis of histamineAnalytical Biochemistry, 1974