Identification and Outcomes of KDIGO-Defined Chronic Kidney Disease in 1.4 Million U.S. Veterans with Heart Failure
Authors:
- 1 May 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Heart Failure
- Vol. 26 (5) , 1251-1260
Abstract
Aims: According to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline, the definition of chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires the presence of abnormal kidney structure or function for >3 months with implications for health. CKD in patients with heart failure (HF) has not been defined using this definition, and less is known about the true health implications of CKD in these patients. The objective of the current study was to identify patients with HF who met KDIGO criteria for CKD and examine their outcomes. Methods and results: Of the 1 419 729 Veterans with HF not receiving kidney replacement therapy, 828 744 had data on ≥2 ambulatory serum creatinine >90 days apart. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30 mg/g (n = 32 730) present twice >3 months apart. Normal kidney function (NKF) was defined as eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2, present for >3 months, without any uACR >30 mg/g (n = 365 963). Patients with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were categorized into four stages: 45–59 (n = 72 606), 30–44 (n = 74 812), 15–29 (n = 32 077), and 30mg/g (albuminuria), respectively. Compared with NKF, hazard ratios (HR) (95% confidence intervals [CI]) for all-cause mortality associated with the four eGFR stages and albuminuria were 1.63 (1.62–1.65), 2.00 (1.98–2.02), 2.49 (2.45–2.52), 2.28 (2.21–2.35), and 1.22 (1.20–1.24), respectively. Respective age-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) were 1.13 (1.12–1.14), 1.36 (1.34–1.37), 1.87 (1.84–1.89), 2.24 (2.18–2.31) and 1.19 (1.17–1.21), and multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) were 1.11 (1.10–1.12), 1.24 (1.22–1.25), 1.46 (1.43–1.48), 1.42 (1.38–1.47), and 1.13 (1.11–1.16). Similar patterns were observed for associations with hospitalizations. Conclusion: Data needed to define CKD using KDIGO criteria were available in six out of ten patients, and CKD could be defined in seven out of ten patients with data. HF patients with KDIGO-defined CKD had higher risks for poor outcomes, most of which was not explained by abnormal kidney structure or function. Future studies need to examine whether CKD defined using a single eGFR is characteristically and prognostically different from CKD defined using KDIGO criteria.Keywords
Funding Information
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01HX002422)
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01HX002422)
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney DiseaseKidney International, 2024
- Systolic Blood Pressure and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionJACC, 2019
- Systolic Blood Pressure and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection FractionJAMA Cardiology, 2018
- Muscle Wasting and Sarcopenia in Heart Failure and Beyond: Update 2017ESC Heart Failure, 2017
- Multiple ImputationJAMA, 2015
- Increased Risk of Stroke with Darbepoetin Alfa in Anaemic Heart Failure Patients with Diabetes and Chronic Kidney DiseaseEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2015
- Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity‐score matched samplesStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- Epidemiology of Chronic Kidney Disease in Heart FailureHeart Failure Clinics, 2008
- High Prevalence of Renal Dysfunction and Its Impact on Outcome in 118,465 Patients Hospitalized With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Report From the ADHERE DatabaseJournal of Cardiac Failure, 2007
- Chronic Kidney Disease Associated Mortality in Diastolic Versus Systolic Heart Failure: A Propensity Matched Study††The Digitalis Investigation Group study was conducted and supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute in collaboration with the Digitalis Investigation Group Investigators. This manuscript was prepared using a limited access data set obtained by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and does not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of the Digitalis Investigation Group or the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.The American Journal of Cardiology, 2007