Issues and voting in the European elections 1989
Author:
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in European Journal of Political Research
- Vol. 19 (1) , 81-103
Abstract
After a discussion of the role of ‘issues’ in models of voting behaviour, this article focuses on the degree of homogeneity of issue evaluations on the one hand and the match between issue evaluations and vote choice on the other. Three major conclusions emerge from cross-national comparative analyses. First, and quite generally, a large segment of the national electorates does not perceive any particular party as best able to handle any of the problems they personally feel most important. Second, when particular parties are considered as best able to handle the problems seen as most important, then uniform - or homogeneous - evaluations outnumber more varied choices by far. And third, overall vote intention matches the competence evaluation much more often than not. These results give little support for the cognitive, rational choice approach to issue voting, but, still issue competence evaluations may be more than merely a reflection of affective ties.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate EvaluationAmerican Political Science Review, 1989
- A Directional Theory of Issue VotingAmerican Political Science Review, 1989
- The utility of surveys for cross-national researchSocial Science Research, 1987
- Economic Conditions and Party Competence: Processes of Belief RevisionThe Journal of Politics, 1987
- Maximizing utility at the polls? A replication of Himmelweit's ‘Consumer Model of Voting’ with German election data from 1983European Journal of Political Research, 1986
- Nine Second-Order National Elections – A Conceptual Framework For The Analysis of European Election ResultsEuropean Journal of Political Research, 1980