Prostate Cancer Cell Telomere Length Variability and Stromal Cell Telomere Length as Prognostic Markers for Metastasis and Death
Authors:
- Christopher M. HeaphyCHChristopher M. Heaphy
- Ghil Suk YoonGYGhil Suk Yoon
- Sarah B. PeskoeSPSarah B. Peskoe
- Corinne E. JoshuCJCorinne E. Joshu
- Thomas K. LeeTLThomas K. Lee
- Edward GiovannucciEGEdward Giovannucci
- Lorelei A. MucciLMLorelei A. Mucci
- Stacey A. KenfieldSKStacey A. Kenfield
- Meir J. StampferMSMeir J. Stampfer
- Jessica L. HicksJHJessica L. Hicks
- Angelo M. De MarzoAMAngelo M. De Marzo
- Elizabeth A. PlatzEPElizabeth A. Platz
- 1 October 2013
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Discovery
- Vol. 3 (10) , 1130-1141
Abstract
Current prognostic indicators are imperfect predictors of outcome in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Thus, tissue-based markers are urgently needed to improve treatment and surveillance decision-making. Given that shortened telomeres enhance chromosomal instability and such instability is a hallmark of metastatic lesions, we hypothesized that alterations in telomere length in the primary cancer would predict risk of progression to metastasis and prostate cancer death. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a prospective cohort study of 596 surgically treated men who participated in the ongoing Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Men who had the combination of more variable telomere length among prostate cancer cells (cell-to-cell) and shorter telomere length in prostate cancer–associated stromal (CAS) cells were substantially more likely to progress to metastasis or die of their prostate cancer. These findings point to the translational potential of this telomere biomarker for prognostication and risk stratification for individualized therapeutic and surveillance strategies. Significance: In this prospective study, the combination of more variable telomere length among cancer cells and shorter telomere length in CAS cells was strongly associated with progression to metastasis and prostate cancer death, pointing to the translational potential for prognostication and risk stratification for individualized therapeutic and surveillance strategies. Cancer Discov; 3(10); 1130–41. ©2013 AACR. See related commentary by Shay, p. 1096 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1083Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer?Nature Reviews Cancer, 2012
- Telomere DNA Content in Prostate Biopsies Predicts Early Rise in Prostate-specific Antigen After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate CancerUrology, 2010
- In BriefNature Reviews Genetics, 2010
- Telomeres: protecting chromosomes against genome instabilityNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2010
- The role of genetic diversity in cancerJournal of Clinical Investigation, 2010
- How Telomeres Solve the End-Protection ProblemScience, 2009
- Gleason Score and Lethal Prostate Cancer: Does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Aberrant Cytoplasmic Expression of p63 and Prostate Cancer MortalityCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2009
- How Shelterin Protects Mammalian TelomeresAnnual Review of Genetics, 2008
- A DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescenceNature, 2003