Residual information processing in the neglected visual half-field
Authors:
- 1 April 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Neurology
- Vol. 234 (3) , 180-184
Abstract
A patient with neglect of visual half-field without hemianopia performed “same/different” interfield comparisons and named stimuli presented either unilaterally or bilaterally in the visual half-fields. With unilateral presentation he could name all stimuli in both fields, whereas with simultaneous bilateral stimulation his performance decreased to about 50% correct naming of left visual field (LVF) stimuli. This performance was not improved by cueing for the presence of LVF stimuli. Interfield comparisons were 100% correct in all conditions. It is concluded that inattention for the left hemispace in patients with visual neglect occurs whenever information in the right hemi-space attracts attention or must be consciously processed. Simple “same/different” judgements are presumably performed on a pre-attentional level and are not affected by neglect.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attentionThe Journal of Neuroscience, 1984
- Subcortical neglectNeurology, 1984
- Classical “parietal” neglect syndrome after subcortical right frontal lobe infarctionNeurology, 1983
- The effect of cueing on unilateral neglectNeuropsychologia, 1983
- Subcortical neglectNeurology, 1982
- Neglect following damage to frontal lobe or basal gangliaNeuropsychologia, 1980
- Information processing of visual stimuli in an ‘extinguished’ fieldNature, 1979
- Unilateral Neglect of Representational SpaceCortex, 1978