Comparison of Plusoptix S12R photoscreener with cycloplegic retinoscopy and autorefraction in pediatric age group
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 January 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Medknow in Indian Journal Of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 67 (10) , 1555-1559
Abstract
Purpose: To compare refractive measurements of noncycloplegic photoscreener Plusoptix S12R with cycloplegic retinoscopy, noncycloplegic autorefractor, and cycloplegic autorefractor in children. Methods: The study population (200 eyes of 100 children) was divided into two groups: Group 1 (age 3–7 years) and Group 2 (age 8–15 years). In Group 1, Plusoptix was compared with cycloplegic retinoscopy. In Group 2, Plusoptix was compared with cycloplegic retinoscopy and autorefraction. The second group was made because the younger group was found to be uncooperative for autorefraction. Paired t-test and Pearson's correlation were used for statistical analysis. Results: The mean difference in sphere (DS), spherical equivalent (DSE), and cylinder (DC) between cycloplegic retinoscopy and Plusoptix in Group 1 was 0.68 ± 0.55 (P < 0.001), 0.77 ± 0.61 (P < 0.001), and 0.18 ± 0.28 (P < 0.001), respectively. In Group 2, DS, DSE, and DC between cycloplegic retinoscopy and Plusoptix were 0.86 ± 0.49 (P < 0.001), 0.97 ± 0.51 (P < 0.001), and 0.23 ± 0.28 (P < 0.001); between cycloplegic autorefractor and Plusoptix were 0.69 ± 0.47 (P < 0.001), 0.74 ± 0.49 (P < 0.001), and 0.10 ± 0.31 (P = 0.002); and between noncycloplegic autorefractor and Plusoptix were − 0.25 ± 0.39 (P < 0.001), −0.19 ± 0.41 (P < 0.001), and 0.11 ± 0.31 (P < 0.001), respectively. Pearson's correlation coefficients of S, SE, and C between Plusoptix and cycloplegic retinoscopy were 0.948, 0.938, and 0.924 in Group 1 and 0.972, 0.972, and 0.946 in Group 2, and these values were statistically significant. Bland–Altman plots showed good agreement between cycloplegic retinoscopy and Plusoptix in both groups. Plusoptix gave axis values within 10° of cycloplegic retinoscopy in 81.56% of eyes in Group 1 and in 71.44% of eyes in Group 2. Conclusion: Plusoptix photoscreener can be used for prescription of axis of cylinder in children; however, other refractive measurements must be refined by cycloplegic retinoscopy.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance of the Plusoptix A09 Photoscreener in Detecting Amblyopia Risk Factors in Chinese Children Attending an Eye ClinicPLOS ONE, 2015
- A comparison of the Plusoptix S08 photorefractor to retinoscopy and cycloretinoscopyClinical and Experimental Optometry, 2013
- Plusoptix photoscreening may replace cycloplegic examination in select pediatric ophthalmology patientsJournal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2013
- Instrument-Based Pediatric Vision Screening Policy StatementPediatrics, 2012
- Screening for refractive errors in children: The plusoptiX S08 and the Retinomax K-plus2 performed by a lay screener compared to cycloplegic retinoscopyJournal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2010
- An analysis of vision screening data from New York City public schoolsOptometry - Journal of the American Optometric Association, 2010
- A comparison of photorefraction and retinoscopy in childrenJournal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2007
- Accuracy of a new photorefractometer in young and adult patientsGraefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2005
- Refractive error blindness.2003
- The Rotterdam AMblyopia Screening Effectiveness Study (RAMSES): compliance and predictive value in the first 2 yearsBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2001