Usefulness of feedback in e-learning from the students' perspective
Open Access
- 20 October 2015
- journal article
- Published by Omnia Publisher SL in Intangible Capital
- Vol. 11 (4) , 627-645
Abstract
Purpose: Functionality of feedback in pedagogical processes has been broadly analyzed in face-to-face learning, although to a lesser extent than in the on-line learning. Narciss (2004, 2008) distinguishes two dimensions within the feedback, the semantic dimension and the structural dimension. This article aims to analyze, from the student’s perspective, the semantic dimension of feedback in a virtual learning environment (VLE). Firstly, we analyze the importance that VLE students give to feedback and its degree of personalization. Later, the usefulness that students deem feedback should have, paying special attention to each of its semantic subdimensions (Narciss, 2004). Design/methodology/approach: A survey was conducted among students of Business Administration degree of the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC). 182 students took part, separated into two groups (pilot and control). Findings: It has been proved that 90% of students give a great or very great importance to reception of feedback from their tutors, a relevance they consider to be higher than the one within a face-to-face environment. This percentage is around 75% with regard to the importance given to the level of personalization of feedback. The development of a factor analysis has revealed that usefulness of personalized feedback perceived by the students can be subsumed under two large dimensions: the one that facilitates learning (related to its semantic dimension) and the motivational one (by allowing an easier and more fluid communication with the tutor, contributing not to leave the course, etc.) The latter dimension has been also proved to be key in order to attain improvements in the students’ satisfaction with the learning process. This research was funded by the Catalan government and the UOC, within the framework of projects to Improve Teaching Quality (ITQ). Originality/value: Implementing personalized feedback has a relevant impact on the student, who values it because it makes his learning process easier, richer and more significant. Moreover, it has a clear motivational effect over the student, which had not been sufficiently evidenced by other researches. Such effect needs not to be underestimated, particularly within an on-line environment, where dropout rate is usually high.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The value of feedback in improving collaborative writing assignments in an online learning environmentStudies in Higher Education, 2012
- Fostering achievement and motivation with bug-related tutoring feedback in a computer-based training for written subtractionLearning and Instruction, 2006
- The Impact of Informative Tutoring Feedback and Self-Efficacy on Motivation and Achievement in Concept LearningExperimental Psychology, 2004
- Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedbackSystem, 2003
- Providing Effective Support: Investigating feedback to distance language learnersOpen Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 2001
- Using Technology to Enhance Mathematical Reasoning: Effects of Feedback and Self-Regulation LearningEducational Media International, 2001
- The efficacy of a World‐Wide Web mediated formative assessmentJournal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2000
- Providing feedback to distant studentsCampus-Wide Information Systems, 1999
- The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.Psychological Bulletin, 1996
- Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitudeEducational Psychology Review, 1989