Surgical procedures for posterior fossa tumors in children: does craniotomy lead to fewer complications than craniectomy?
Authors:
- Kanna K. GnanalinghamKGKanna K. Gnanalingham
- Jesus LafuenteJLJesus Lafuente
- Dominic ThompsonDTDominic Thompson
- William HarknessWHWilliam Harkness
- Richard HaywardRHRichard Hayward
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) in Journal of Neurosurgery
- Vol. 97 (4) , 821-826
Abstract
Object. Traditionally, access to the posterior fossa involved a suboccipital craniectomy. More recently, posterior fossa craniotomies have been described, although the long-term benefits of this procedure are not clear. The authors compared the postoperative complications of craniectomies and craniotomies in children with posterior fossa tumors. Methods. From a total of 110 children undergoing surgery for posterior fossa tumors, 56 underwent craniectomy and 54 had a craniotomy. The mean duration of the hospital stay was longer in the craniectomy group (17.5 compared with 14 days). At operation, similar numbers of patients in both groups had total macroscopic clearance of the tumor, complete dural closure, and duraplasty. Postoperatively, more patients in the craniectomy group were noted to have cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage (27 compared with 4%; p < 0.01) and pseudomeningoceles (23 compared with 9%; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the numbers of patients with CSF infections, wound infections, or hydrocephalus requiring permanent CSF drainage. Patients with CSF leaks had a longer duration of hospital stay (20.7 compared with 14.9 days; p < 0.01), and were more likely to have CSF infections (35 compared with 12%; p < 0.01) and wound infections (24 compared with 1%; p < 0.01) than patients without CSF leaks. Postoperatively, wound exploration and reclosures for CSF leakage were more likely in the craniectomy group (11 compared with 0%; p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the only predictor of CSF leakage postoperatively was the type of surgery (that is, craniotomy compared with craniectomy; odds ratio 10.8; p = 0.03). Conclusions. Craniectomy was associated with postoperative CSF leaks, pseudomeningocele, increased wound reclosures, and thus prolonged hospital stays. In turn, CSF leakage was associated with infections of the CSF and wound. The authors propose mechanisms that may explain why CSF leakage is less likely if the bone flap is replaced.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Penetrating injury of the brain by the burr of a high-speed air drill during craniotomy: case reportJournal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2001
- Concerning the article by Kurpad and Cohen Pediatr Neurosurg 1999;31:54–57. Posterior Fossa Craniotomy: An Alternative to CraniectomyPediatric Neurosurgery, 1999
- Medulloblastoma: is the 5-year survival rate improving?Journal of Neurosurgery, 1997
- Impact of Cranioplasty on Headache after Acoustic Neuroma RemovalNeurosurgery, 1995
- Posterior fossa duraplasty in children: remarks on surgery and clinical and CT follow-upChild's Nervous System, 1994
- An Analysis of Factors Determining the Need for Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts after Posterior Fossa Tumor Surgery in ChildrenNeurosurgery, 1994
- Posterior fossa craniotomy for lesions of the cerebellopontine angleJournal of Neurosurgery, 1993
- Post-operative infections of osteoplastic compared with free bone flapsBritish Journal Of Neurosurgery, 1990
- Central nervous system tumors in children cns tumors in childrenCancer, 1977
- Exposure of the Posterior or Cerebellar FossaJournal of Neurosurgery, 1966