Comparison of Classification-Based Physical Therapy With Therapy Based on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Patients with Acute Low Back Pain
Authors:
- Julie M. FritzJFJulie M. Fritz
- Anthony DelittoADAnthony Delitto
- Richard E. ErhardRERichard E. Erhard
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 28 (13) , 1363-1371
Abstract
A randomized clinical trial was conducted. To compare the effectiveness of classification-based physical therapy with that of therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute, work-related low back pain. Clinical practice guidelines recommend minimal intervention during the first few weeks after acute low back injury. However, studies supporting this recommendation have not attempted to identify which patients are likely to respond to particular interventions. For this study, 78 subjects with work-related low back pain of less than 3 weeks duration were randomized to receive therapy based on a classification system that attempts to match patients to specific interventions or therapy based on the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guidelines. The subjects were followed for 1 year. Outcomes included the impairment index, Oswestry scale, SF-36 component scores, satisfaction, medical costs, and return to work status. After adjustment for baseline factors, subjects receiving classification-based therapy showed greater change on the Oswestry (P = 0.023) and the SF-36 physical component (P = 0.029) after 4 weeks. Patient satisfaction was greater (P = 0.006) and return to full-duty work status more likely (P = 0.017) after 4 weeks in the classification-based group. After 1 year, there was a trend toward reduced Oswestry scores in the classification-based group (P = 0.063). Median total medical costs for 1 year after injury were $1003.68 for the guideline-based group and $774.00 for the classification-based group (P = 0.13). For patients with acute, work-related low back pain, the use of a classification-based approach resulted in improved disability and return to work status after 4 weeks, as compared with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines. Further research is needed on the optimal timing and methods of intervention for patients with acute low back pain.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exercise Therapy for Low Back PainSpine, 2000
- The Prevalence of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1966 to 1998Journal of Spinal Disorders, 2000
- Recurrence and Care Seeking After Acute Back PainMedical Care, 1999
- Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective studyBMJ, 1998
- Professional uncertainty and treatment choices by physical therapistsArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1997
- Efficacy of Traction for Nonspecific Low Back PainSpine, 1997
- Conservative Treatment of Acute and Chronic Nonspecific Low Back PainSpine, 1997
- The Efficacy of Traction for Back and Neck Pain: A Systematic, Blinded Review of Randomized Clinical Trial MethodsPhysical Therapy, 1995
- What Information Do Consumers Want and How Will They Use It?Medical Care, 1995
- Managing Low Back Pain: Attitudes and Treatment Preferences of Physical TherapistsPhysical Therapy, 1994