Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions
Authors:
- Asbjørn HróbjartssonAHAsbjørn Hróbjartsson
- Peter C GøtzschePGPeter C Gøtzsche
- 19 April 2004
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 3,p. CD003974
Abstract
Placebo interventions are often claimed to improve patient-reported and observer-reported outcomes, but this belief is not based on evidence from randomised trials that compare placebo with no treatment. To assess the effect of placebo interventions. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to 2002), EMBASE (1980 to 2002), Biological Abstracts (1986 to 2002), and PsycLIT (1887 to 2002). We contacted experts on placebo research, and read references in the included trials. We included randomised placebo trials with a no-treatment control group investigating any health problem. Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. Outcome data were available in 156 out of 182 included trials, investigating 46 clinical conditions. We found no statistically significant pooled effect of placebo in 38 studies with binary outcomes (4284 patients), relative risk 0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 1.01). The pooled relative risk for patient-reported outcomes was 0.95 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.03) and for observer-reported outcomes 0.91 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.03). There was heterogeneity (P=0.01) but the funnel plot was symmetrical. There was no statistically significant effect of placebo interventions in the four clinical conditions investigated in three trials or more: pain, nausea, smoking, and depression, but confidence intervals were wide. We found an overall effect of placebo treatments in 118 trials with continuous outcomes (7453 patients), standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.24 (95% CI -0.31 to -0.17). The SMD for patient-reported outcomes was -0.30 (95% CI -0.38 to -0.21), whereas no statistically significant effect was found for observer-reported outcomes, SMD -0.10 (95% CI -0.20 to -0.01). There was heterogeneity (P<0.001) and large variability in funnel plot results even for big trials. There was an apparent effect of placebo interventions on pain (SMD -0.25 (95% CI -0.35 to-0.16)), and phobia (SMD -0.63 (95% CI -1.17 to -0.08)); but also a substantial risk of bias. There was no statistically significant effect of placebo interventions in eight other clinical conditions investigated in three trials or more: nausea, smoking, depression, overweight, asthma, hypertension, insomnia and anxiety, but confidence intervals were wide. There was no evidence that placebo interventions in general have clinically important effects. A possible small effect on continuous patient-reported outcomes, especially pain, could not be clearly distinguished from bias.Keywords
This publication has 298 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is routinely given conscious sedation of benefit during colonoscopy?Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1999
- The use of a topical refrigerant anesthetic to reduce injection pain in childrenJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1995
- ADHD boys' performance and attributions following success and failure: Drug effects and individual differencesCognitive Therapy and Research, 1993
- Group cognitive therapy for medical patients: An application to tinnitusCognitive Therapy and Research, 1992
- Effectiveness of an antihistamine-decongestant combination for young children with the common cold: A randomized, controlled clinical trialThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- Efficacy of interferon alfa-2b with or without prednisone withdrawal in the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis B. A prospective double-blind Belgian-Dutch studyJournal of Hepatology, 1990
- Attributional outcomes: The subtle messages of treatments for attention deficit disorderCognitive Therapy and Research, 1989
- Reduction of postoperative pain and swelling by ultrasound treatment: a placebo effectPain, 1988
- Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for controlling pain associated with orthodontic tooth movementAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1986
- Physiologic Observations in a Controlled Clinical Trial of the Antiemetic Effectiveness of 5, 10, and 15 mg of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Cancer Chemotherapy. Ophthalmologic ImplicationsThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1981