Methodology for Developing Deprescribing Guidelines: Using Evidence and GRADE to Guide Recommendations for Deprescribing
Open Access
- 12 August 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 11 (8) , e0161248
Abstract
Class specific deprescribing guidelines could help clinicians taper and stop medications no longer needed or which may be causing more harm than benefit. We set out to develop methodology to create such guidelines using evidence-based methods for guideline development, evidence synthesis and recommendation rating. Using a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise, we conducted a national modified Delphi consensus process to identify priorities for deprescribing guidelines, then conducted scoping exercises to identify feasible topics, and sequentially developed three deprescribing guidelines. We selected guideline development team members for clinical expertise; a GRADE member worked with staff to ensure guideline development processes were followed. We conducted or used systematic searches and reviews of deprescribing trials of selected drug classes, reviews or systematic reviews of drug class effectiveness, reviews of reviews of drug class harm and narrative syntheses of contextual questions to inform recommendations and guideline development. Our 8 step process for guideline development included defining scope and purpose, developing a logic model to guide the process and generate key clinical questions, setting criteria for admissible evidence and conducting systematic reviews, synthesizing evidence considering additional contextual information and performing quality estimates, formulating recommendations and providing strength estimations, adding clinical considerations, conducting clinical and stakeholder review and finally updating content pre-publication. Innovative aspects of the guideline development process included synthesizing evidence for outcomes of tapering or stopping medication, and incorporating evidence for medication harm into the recommendation strength rating. Through the development of three deprescribing guidelines (for proton pump inhibitors, benzodiazepine receptor agonists and antipsychotics) and associated decision-support algorithms, we were able to gradually hone the methodology; each guideline will be published separately. Our methodology demonstrates the importance of searching for short and long-term outcomes, showing the benefits of deprescribing and studying patient preferences. This publication will support development of future deprescribing guidelines.Keywords
Funding Information
- Government of Ontario (#06674)
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Process for guideline development by the reconstituted Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health CareCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2012
- Deprescribing medication in very elderly patients with multimorbidity: the view of Dutch GPs. A qualitative studyBMC Family Practice, 2012
- Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamic Changes Associated with Aging and Implications for Drug TherapyClinics in Geriatric Medicine, 2012
- Polypharmacy, Adverse Drug Reactions, and Geriatric SyndromesClinics in Geriatric Medicine, 2012
- Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventionsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health careJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health careCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2010
- Polypharmacy Status as an Indicator of Mortality in an Elderly PopulationDrugs & Aging, 2009
- Medication Withdrawal Trials in People Aged 65 Years and OlderDrugs & Aging, 2008
- Polypharmacy in elderly patientsThe American Journal of Geriatric Pharmacotherapy, 2007