Physicians' Interactions With Third-Party Payers
Authors:
- Sidney T. BogardusSBSidney T. Bogardus
- David E. GeistDGDavid E. Geist
- Elizabeth H. BradleyEBElizabeth H. Bradley
- 27 September 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 164 (17) , 1841-1844
Abstract
Published reports indicate that physicians sometimes use deceptive tactics with third-party payers. Many physicians appear to be willing to deceive to secure care that they perceive as necessary, particularly when illnesses are severe and appeals procedures for care denials are burdensome. Physicians whose practices include larger numbers of Medicaid or managed care patients seem more willing to deceive third-party payers than are other physicians. The use of deception has important implications for physician professionalism, patient trust, and rational health policy development. If deception is as widespread as these studies suggest, there may be serious problems in the medical profession and the health care financing systems at the interface between physicians and third-party payers. Deception may be a symptom of a flawed system, in which physicians are asked to implement financing policies that conflict with their primary obligation to the patient.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Support for Physician Deception of Insurance Companies among a Sample of Philadelphia ResidentsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Changes in Career Satisfaction Among Primary Care and Specialist Physicians, 1997-2001JAMA, 2003
- Medical Professionalism in the New Millennium: A Physician CharterAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Managed Care and the Morality of the MarketplaceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- The deliberate misdiagnosis of major depression in primary careArchives of Family Medicine, 1994
- Telling the truth.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1991