From Storage Capacity to Differentiated Stormwater Roles: A Comparative Framework for Sustainable Assessment of Sponge City Parks in Shanghai
Open Access
- 8 June 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 18 (12) , 5838
Abstract
Public parks are increasingly expected to function not only as recreational green spaces but also as components of urban green stormwater infrastructure. In practice, however, their performance is still commonly judged by stormwater storage capacity alone, a project-level metric that tends to favor larger parks and obscure differences in how parks contribute to broader blue-green stormwater systems. Accordingly, this study aimed to develop and apply an exploratory comparative framework for assessing the differentiated stormwater roles of sponge city parks beyond storage capacity alone. Using 20 sponge city parks in Shanghai as cases, the framework integrates stormwater storage capacity, storage efficiency, flow leverage, and facility configuration. The results show that annual stormwater storage capacity varied substantially across the 20 parks, ranging from 7625.12 m3 to 132,915.24 m3, with a mean value of 47,220.80 m3. However, this capacity-based ranking was strongly associated with park area. Once storage was normalized by area, the ranking changed markedly: line-type parks showed the highest mean storage efficiency of 1.393, followed by node-type parks at 0.921, whereas patch-type parks recorded a much lower mean value of 0.059. Flow leverage scores ranged from 0 to 6, with a mean value of 2.35, indicating that parks with comparable storage performance may occupy different hydrological positions within the broader topographic flow structure. The preliminary capacity-leverage typology further showed that high storage capacity did not always coincide with high hydrological leverage, and facility configuration scores ranged from 1 to 5, suggesting additional variation in internal infrastructural organization. These findings suggest that storage capacity should be complemented by spatial efficiency, hydrological position, and facility configuration when interpreting the differentiated stormwater roles of sponge city parks. The study reframes evaluation from a single project-level storage metric toward a more differentiated understanding of sponge city parks as urban green stormwater infrastructure and supports more sustainable assessment of community-scale stormwater management within broader blue-green systems.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving Blue-Green Transversal Connectivity in Cities: A Case Study of Munich and the Isar RiverCity and Environment Interactions, 2026
- Assessing blue-green infrastructures for urban flood and drought mitigation under changing climate scenariosJournal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2025
- Urban green infrastructure for flood resilience: Runoff sink-source regime shifts and vegetation structure influencesGeography and Sustainability, 2025
- Prioritization Blue-Green Infrastructure Strategies: Developing a Hybrid Quantitative Approach Model for Sustainable Urban Water ManagementWater Resources Management, 2025
- A framework for urban pluvial flood resilient spatial planning through blue-green infrastructureInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2024
- Characteristics, dimensions and methods of current assessment for urban resilience to climate-related disasters: A systematic review of the literatureInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2021
- Landscape ecological concepts in planning: review of recent developmentsLandscape Ecology, 2021
- Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space managementFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2017
- Multifunctionality of floodplain landscapes: relating management options to ecosystem servicesLandscape Ecology, 2014
- Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: A state of the artAdvances in Water Resources, 2013