Abstracting Concept-Changing Rules for Solving Raven's Progressive Matrix Problems
Authors:
- Fan ShiFSFan Shi
- Bin LiBLBin Li
- Xiangyang XueXXXiangyang Xue
Preprint
Abstract
The abstract visual reasoning ability in human intelligence benefits discovering underlying rules in the novel environment. Raven's Progressive Matrix (RPM) is a classic test to realize such ability in machine intelligence by selecting from candidates. Recent studies suggest that solving RPM in an answer-generation way boosts a more in-depth understanding of rules. However, existing generative solvers cannot discover the global concept-changing rules without auxiliary supervision (e.g., rule annotations and distractors in candidate sets). To this end, we propose a deep latent variable model for Concept-changing Rule ABstraction (CRAB) by learning interpretable concepts and parsing concept-changing rules in the latent space. With the iterative learning process, CRAB can automatically abstract global rules shared on the dataset on each concept and form the learnable prior knowledge of global rules. CRAB outperforms the baselines trained without auxiliary supervision in the arbitrary-position answer generation task and achieves comparable and even higher accuracy than the compared models trained with auxiliary supervision. Finally, we conduct experiments to illustrate the interpretability of CRAB in concept learning, answer selection, and global rule abstraction.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Learning Algebraic Representation for Systematic Generalization in Abstract Reasoning2022
- Modeling visual problem solving as analogical reasoning.Psychological Review, 2017
- Making creative metaphors: The importance of fluid intelligence for creative thoughtIntelligence, 2012
- Solve the problem first: Constructive solution strategies can influence the accuracy of retrospective confidence judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
- Neurobiology of intelligence: science and ethicsNature Reviews Neuroscience, 2004
- Category Representation in Young InfantsCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 2002
- Fluid Intelligence, Crystallized Intelligence, and the Openness/Intellect FactorJournal of Research in Personality, 2000
- Basic-level and superordinate-like categorical representations in early infancyCognition, 1996
- Comparing partitionsJournal of Classification, 1985
- Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1963