Infectious morbidity is higher after second-stage compared with first-stage cesareans
- 1 October 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 211 (4) , 410.e1-410.e6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Nulliparas Undergoing Cesarean Section in First and Second Stages of Labour: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Teaching HospitalObstetrics and Gynecology International, 2011
- Attributable Costs of Surgical Site Infection and Endometritis after Low Transverse Cesarean DeliveryInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2010
- The Risk of Acute Neonatal Morbidities in the Delivery Room after Primary Cesarean at Term: Influence of Labor and StageAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 2009
- Timing of perioperative antibiotics for cesarean delivery: a metaanalysisAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008
- Decreasing Incidence of Postcesarean Endometritis With Extended-Spectrum Antibiotic ProphylaxisObstetrics & Gynecology, 2008
- Comparison of Maternal and Infant Outcomes From Primary Cesarean Delivery During the Second Compared With First Stage of LaborObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labourBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2005
- Maternal Morbidity Associated With Vaginal Versus Cesarean DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- The Preterm Prediction Study: Recurrence risk of spontaneous preterm birthAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1998
- Chi-squared goodness-of-fit tests for the proportional hazards regression modelBiometrika, 1980