Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery surgery for left main disease according to lesion site: A meta-analysis

This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:

• Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Ostial/Midshaft Lesions in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery From the DELTA Registry
  JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2014
• The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
  BMJ, 2011
• Validating the EXCEL hypothesis: A propensity score matched 3-year comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft in left main patients with SYNTAX score ≤32
  Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2011
• Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (from a Two-Center Registry)
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 2010
• Ostial and midshaft lesions vs. bifurcation lesions in 1111 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with drug-eluting stents: results of the survey from the Italian Society of Invasive Cardiology
  European Heart Journal, 2009
• Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
  Statistics in Medicine, 2002
• Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration
  The Lancet, 1994
• Relation of the site of acute myocardial infarction to the most severe coronary arterial stenosis at prior angiography
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
• Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease?
  Circulation, 1988
• Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction
  JACC, 1988