Abstract
In well‐populated areas, such as western Europe, PV is often integrated into the building envelope. Despite the fact that there are many examples showing that PV can be an aesthetically neutral or visually attractive element in architecture, many BIPV systems display few architectural qualities. But if well applied, PV can increase a building's character and value. Within Task 7 of the IEA PVPS programme a team of experts with an architectural background studied which key requirements needed to be complied with (design criteria for good‐quality PV projects) in order to produce successful PV integration. These criteria are discussed in the article.PV is not automatically considered an indispensable material in architectural terms. This is why, no matter how well it is integrated, PV remains an ‘added’ element. Architects can take this as their starting point and can use one of the design approaches that are presented in the article. These criteria for incorporating PV in the building design and the design criteria for good‐quality PV projects are important to architects and architectural critics in determining why a BIPV project, be it their own design or that of a colleague, is or is not aesthetically pleasing. This offers learning opportunities and reasons for follow‐up or improvement options. Architects who apply PV in a well‐thought‐out way can make their clients very happy, and thereby contribute to a greater acceptance of PV technology. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.