Menstrual questionnaires for clinical and research use
- 1 April 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Vol. 40, 44-54
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shared Decision Making — The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Questioning Our Questions: Do Frequently Asked Questions Adequately Cover the Aspects of Women's Lives Most Affected by Abnormal Uterine Bleeding? Opinions of Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Participating in Focus Group DiscussionsWomen & Health, 2010
- Abnormal uterine bleeding: a review of patient-based outcome measuresFertility and Sterility, 2009
- Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Equivalence between Electronic and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force ReportValue in Health, 2009
- Electronic pain diary: a randomized crossover studyJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2004
- The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1993
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of lifeHealth Policy, 1990
- The Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1983