Use and Perceptions of Clinical Practice Guidelines by Internal Medicine Physicians
Authors:
- 1 May 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Medical Quality
- Vol. 22 (3) , 170-176
Abstract
The authors sought to explore the use and perceptions of clinical practice guidelines among internal medicine physicians. Through a Web-based survey, 201 board-certified internal medicine physicians rated their opinions on several statements using 7-point Likert scales. Most respondents (74.7%) felt that guidelines were suitable for at least half of their patients, although a failure to take comorbid conditions into account was a frequently cited barrier. For patients with cardiovascular disease, there was no difference between individual internists' perceptions of their own compliance with guidelines and their estimates of cardiologists' compliance (P = .14). A large majority of respondents (70.7%) believed that guideline committee member participation in industry-funded research introduces bias into guideline content (median [interquartile range], 5 [4-6]). Although most respondents felt that measuring physicians against guideline-based performance measures encourages evidence-based medicine (76.5%), opinions were split as to whether this practice distracts from patient care or compromises physician autonomy. (Am J Med Qual 2007;22:170-176)Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cash interests taint drug adviceNature, 2005
- Financial Anatomy of Biomedical ResearchJAMA, 2005
- Clinical Practice Guidelines and Quality of Care for Older Patients With Multiple Comorbid DiseasesJAMA, 2005
- Evidence Based? Caveat Emptor!Health Affairs, 2005
- Evidence-Based Guidelines As a Foundation For Performance IncentivesHealth Affairs, 2005
- Potential Pitfalls of Disease-Specific Guidelines for Patients with Multiple ConditionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Pitfalls of Converting Practice Guidelines Into Quality MeasuresJAMA, 2004
- Association of Funding and Conclusions in Randomized Drug TrialsJAMA, 2003
- Uneasy Alliance — Clinical Investigators and the Pharmaceutical IndustryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Some Effects of "Social Desirability" in Survey StudiesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1972