A comparison of seven methods for obtaining subjective descriptions of judgmental policy
Authors:
- Richard L. CookRCRichard L. Cook
- Thomas R. StewartTSThomas R. Stewart
- 1 February 1975
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
- Vol. 13 (1) , 31-45
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of subjective predictors in regression analysis for policy capturing.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1972
- Cognitive control.Psychological Review, 1972
- The validity of importance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971
- Five models of clinical judgment: An empirical comparison between linear and nonlinear representations of the human inference processOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1971
- Use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models as a function of task and amount of informationOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1971
- Man versus model of man: A rationale, plus some evidence, for a method of improving on clinical inferences.Psychological Bulletin, 1970
- The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making.Psychological Bulletin, 1970
- Multiple regression in psychological research and practice.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- Characteristics of the human inference process in complex choice behavior situationsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1966
- The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment.Psychological Bulletin, 1960