Measuring a Patient's understanding of their prognosis: An exploratory analysis
- 19 August 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Psycho-Oncology
- Vol. 31 (10) , 1790-1798
Abstract
Objective: In patients with cancer across the illness trajectory, treatment decisions are often influenced by one's perception of their prognosis (i.e., curability of disease, life expectancy, quality of life). However, research on how patients understand their prognosis (i.e., prognostic understanding) has been limited by simplistic measurement tools that fail to capture the complexity of the construct. This study describes the initial development of a measure of prognostic understanding: the Prognostic Understanding Perceptions Scale (PUPS) for use in patients with advanced cancer.Method: An initial pool of 16 candidate items were developed through semi‐structured interviews with 15 experts (oncology, psycho‐oncology and palliative care professionals) and 30 advanced cancer patients. We investigated the dimensionality, internal item structure, item difficulty and item discrimination of the item pool using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) analyses. Convergent and divergent validity were based on correlations between PUPS, terminal illness acknowledgement, and self‐report measures of depression, anxiety, hopelessness, and death acceptance.Results: The final measure was comprised of nine items encompassing three factors (perceived curability, illness trajectory, treatment options), yielding strong psychometric properties.Conclusion: These results provide preliminarily support for PUPS as a multifaceted measure of prognostic understanding developed for use in patients with advanced cancer. Preliminary findings also highlight the potential utility of the PUPS for clinical settings, as a means of enhancing communication between patients and physicians.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (R21 CA186932, T32 CA009461, P30 CA008748)
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Associations among prognostic understanding, quality of life, and mood in patients with advanced cancerCancer, 2013
- When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.Psychological Methods, 2012
- Assessing hopelessness in terminally ill cancer patients: Development of the Hopelessness Assessment in Illness Questionnaire.Psychological Assessment, 2011
- Prognostic Awareness and the Terminally IllPsychosomatics, 2000
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- Species Richness of Parasite Assemblages: Evolution and PatternsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1997
- The Duke???UNC Functional Social Support QuestionnaireMedical Care, 1988
- The Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1983
- Estimating the Dimension of a ModelThe Annals of Statistics, 1978
- A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1974