A systematic literature review to evaluate extended dosing intervals in the pharmacological management of acromegaly
Open Access
- 29 November 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Pituitary
- Vol. 26 (1) , 9-41
Abstract
Purpose: This systematic literature review investigated whether extended dosing intervals (EDIs) of pharmacological acromegaly treatments reduce patient burden and costs compared with standard dosing, while maintaining effectiveness. Methods: MEDLINE/Embase/the Cochrane Library (2001–June 2021) and key congresses (2018–2021) were searched and identified systematic literature review bibliographies reviewed. Included publications reported on efficacy/effectiveness, safety and tolerability, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient-reported and economic outcomes in longitudinal/cross-sectional studies in adults with acromegaly. Interventions included EDIs of pegvisomant, cabergoline, and somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs): lanreotide autogel/depot (LAN), octreotide long-acting release (OCT), pasireotide long-acting release (PAS), and oral octreotide; no comparator was required. Results: In total, 35 publications reported on 27 studies: 3 pegvisomant monotherapy, 11 pegvisomant combination therapy with SRLs, 9 LAN, and 4 OCT; no studies reported on cabergoline, PAS, or oral octreotide at EDIs. Maintenance of normal insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) was observed in ≥ 70% of patients with LAN (1 study), OCT (1 study), and pegvisomant monotherapy (1 study). Achievement of normal IGF-I was observed in ≥ 70% of patients with LAN (3 studies) and pegvisomant in combination with SRLs (4 studies). Safety profiles were similar across EDI and standard regimens. Patients preferred and were satisfied with EDIs. HRQoL was maintained and cost savings were provided with EDIs versus standard regimens. Conclusions: Clinical efficacy/effectiveness, safety, and HRQoL outcomes in adults with acromegaly were similar and costs lower with EDIs versus standard regimens. Physicians may consider acromegaly treatment at EDIs, especially for patients with good disease control.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acromegaly: the disease, its impact on patients, and managing the burden of long-term treatmentInternational Journal of General Medicine, 2013
- Clinical, quality of life, and economic value of acromegaly disease controlPituitary, 2011
- Pharmacological management of acromegaly: a current perspectiveNeurosurgical Focus, 2010
- Acromegaly pathogenesis and treatmentJournal of Clinical Investigation, 2009
- Successful use of weekly pegvisomant administration in patients with acromegalyEuropean Journal of Endocrinology, 2009
- Optimalization and cost management of lanreotide-Autogel therapy in acromegalyEuropean Journal of Endocrinology, 2007
- Efficacy of a slow‐release formulation of lanreotide (Autogel® 120 mg) in patients with acromegaly previously treated with octreotide long acting release (LAR): an open, multicentre longitudinal studyClinical Endocrinology, 2007
- Efficacy of lanreotide Autogel® administered every 4–8 weeks in patients with acromegaly previously responsive to lanreotide microparticles 30 mg: a phase III trialClinical Endocrinology, 2006
- Systematic dose‐extension of octreotide LAR: the importance of individual tailoring of treatment in patients with acromegalyClinical Endocrinology, 2004
- Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation in the Real WorldPharmacoEconomics, 1999