Reasons for and Congruence Between Preferred and Actual Place of Death Among Cancer Patients Receiving End-of-Life Care: A Cross-Cultural Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study in East Asia
Authors:
- Chiu-Hsien YangCYChiu-Hsien Yang
- Chien-Yi WuCWChien-Yi Wu
- Shao-Yi ChengSCShao-Yi Cheng
- Masanori MoriMMMasanori Mori
- Sang-Yeon SuhSSSang-Yeon Suh
- Sun-Hyun KimSKSun-Hyun Kim
- Wen-Yuan LinWLWen-Yuan Lin
- Takashi YamaguchiTYTakashi Yamaguchi
- Hsien-Liang HuangHHHsien-Liang Huang
- Jun HamanoJHJun Hamano
- Yusuke HiratsukaYHYusuke Hiratsuka
- Satoru TsunetoSTSatoru Tsuneto
Open Access
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The place where a person dies serves as an indicator of end-of-life care quality. This study aims to identify the congruence of place of death (POD) and the reasons behind decision-making among terminally ill cancer patients in East Asia. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study in palliative care units in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. Data were collected by the responsible physicians during routine clinical practice. Sankey diagrams were applied to present changes in reasons for POD incongruence. Results: A total of 2638 participants from 37 palliative care units in the three countries were enrolled, and most of them died at PCUs (Japan: 95.7%, Korea: 94%, Taiwan: 82%, p < 0.05). The congruence rate of the preferred and actual POD among PCU inpatients ranged from 70% to 80%. Availability of end-of-life care is the most common reason for preferred and eventual PCU death (78.6%, 72.2%, and 52.1%, respectively, p < 0.05). However, 13–22% of patients admitted to PCUs still preferred to die at home, for which traditional culture (20.2%, 40.8%, and 82%, respectively, p < 0.05) or family influence (44.4%, 38.8%, and 51.7%, respectively, p > 0.05) are the main reasons. Cultural and environmental factors, such as influences from family members’ preferences in the three countries or the ownership of housing/housing settings in Japan, are the main challenges in achieving POD congruence. Conclusions: Culturally inclusive strategies in clinical practice and policy implementation for identifying the preferred POD, enhancing communication among stakeholders, and facilitating transitional support may improve the quality of goal-concordant care.Keywords
Funding Information
- Japan Hospice Palliative Care Foundation (JP16H05212, 112-2410-H-037-005-MY3, KMUH113-3R66)
- National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan (JP16H05212, 112-2410-H-037-005-MY3, KMUH113-3R66)
- Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital (JP16H05212, 112-2410-H-037-005-MY3, KMUH113-3R66)
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Valuing End-of-Life Care for Older People with Advanced Cancer: Is Dying at Home Important?The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2021
- Communication and Behavior of Palliative Care Physicians of Patients With Cancer Near End of Life in Three East Asian CountriesJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2021
- Cultural Factors Influencing Advance Care Planning in Progressive, Incurable Disease: A Systematic Review With Narrative SynthesisJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2018
- Prevailing Ethical Dilemmas Encountered by Physicians in Terminal Cancer Care Changed After the Enactment of the Natural Death Act: 15 Years' Follow-up SurveyJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2018
- The Quality of Dying and Death in Cancer and Its Relationship to Palliative Care and Place of DeathJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2014
- Preferred place of care and place of death of the general public and cancer patients in JapanSupportive Care in Cancer, 2012
- Determinants of Patient-Family Caregiver Congruence on Preferred Place of Death in TaiwanJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2010
- The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD): Empirical Domains and Theoretical PerspectivesJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2010
- Prospective Study of Health Status PREFERENCES and Changes in PREFERENCES Over Time in Older AdultsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2006
- Factors influencing preferences for place of terminal care and of death among cancer patients and their families in KoreaSupportive Care in Cancer, 2005