The Effects of Different Management and Processing Methods on the Carbon Footprint of Chinese Hickory

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Amidst the global shift towards a low-carbon development trajectory, the hickory industry in Lin’an District is progressively embracing green, low-carbon, and sustainable practices. This study, leveraging the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, meticulously scrutinizes the carbon footprint of the hickory industry by segmenting its life cycle into two distinct subsystems: the plantation and the factory. Through comprehensive, year-long monitoring of soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in hickory plantations, our findings underscore that while total GHG emissions from eco-complex management (ECM) surpassed those of intensive management (IM) by 10.7% (p < 0.001), ECM significantly mitigated the carbon footprint per kilogram of hickory produced, achieving a reduction of 1.0495 kgCO2eq. This advantage is primarily attributable to ECM’s diminished reliance on chemical fertilizers. Within the factory subsystem, when processing 1 kg of hickory, the digital factory incurred a carbon footprint of 2.5923 kgCO2eq kg−1, whereas family workshops exhibited a lower footprint of 1.9544 kgCO2eq kg−1. Notably, the processing and packaging stages collectively accounted for over 90% of the factory subsystem’s carbon emissions, with natural gas being the primary contributor during processing. To estimate the carbon emission reduction potential within the hickory industry, this research draws parallels with emission reduction strategies employed by other industries and outlines tailored strategies to propel its low-carbon development. By advocating for the widespread adoption of ECM and enhancing the energy efficiency of processing enterprises, the hickory industry can effectively diminish its carbon footprint and steer towards a green, low-carbon, and high-quality development paradigm.
Funding Information
  • Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (2022C03039, 2021C02005, 2023C02003, 2023YFE0105100)
  • China National Key Research and Development Program (2022C03039, 2021C02005, 2023C02003, 2023YFE0105100)

This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit: