Clinical Validation of MyProstateScore 2.0 Testing Using First-Catch, Non–Digital Rectal Examination Urine
Authors:
- Jeffrey J. TosoianJTJeffrey J. Tosoian
- Yuping ZhangYZYuping Zhang
- Jacob I. MeyersJMJacob I. Meyers
- Spencer HeatonSHSpencer Heaton
- Javed SiddiquiJSJaved Siddiqui
- Lanbo XiaoLXLanbo Xiao
- Keavash D. AssaniKAKeavash D. Assani
- Daniel A. BarocasDBDaniel A. Barocas
- Ashley E. RossARAshley E. Ross
- Zoey ChopraZCZoey Chopra
- Grace C. HerronGHGrace C. Herron
Open Access
- 1 May 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 213 (5) , 581-589
Abstract
The 18-gene MyProstateScore 2.0 (MPS2) test was previously validated for detection of grade group (GG) ≥ 2 prostate cancer using post-digital rectal examination (DRE) urine. To improve ease of testing, we validated MPS2 using first-catch, non-DRE urine. Patients provided first-catch urine before biopsy. MPS2 values were calculated using previously validated models differing only by extent of clinical data included biomarkers alone (BA; no clinical data), biomarkers and clinical factors (BA + CF), and biomarkers, clinical factors, and prostate volume (BA + CF + PV). The primary outcome was GG ≥ 2 cancer on biopsy. MPS2 performance and clinical consequences of testing were compared with PSA and the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator (PCPTrc). The cohort included 266 men with median PSA 6.6 ng/mL (IQR, 4.9-9.1) of whom 103 (39%) had GG ≥ 2 cancer on biopsy. The AUC for GG ≥ 2 cancer was 57% for PSA, 62% for PCPTrc, and 71%, 74%, and 77% for MPS2 models. Under a testing approach detecting > 90% of GG ≥ 2 cancers, MPS2 testing would have avoided 36% to 42% of unnecessary biopsies, as compared with 13% using the PCPTrc. In patients with a prior negative biopsy, MPS2 testing would have avoided 44% to 53% of repeat biopsies, as compared with only 2.6% using PCPTrc. Using first-catch urine, MPS2 meaningfully improved the proportion of biopsies avoided relative to PCPTrc while maintaining highly sensitive detection of GG ≥ 2 cancer. Non-DRE testing provides a convenient, objective, and highly accurate testing option to reduce the need for imaging and biopsy in men with elevated PSA.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Multi-institutional Prospective Trial in the USA Confirms that the 4Kscore Accurately Identifies Men with High-grade Prostate CancerEuropean Urology, 2015
- The Prostate Health Index Selectively Identifies Clinically Significant Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2015
- Upgrading and Downgrading of Prostate Cancer from Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Predictive Factors Using the Modified Gleason Grading System and Factoring in Tertiary GradesEuropean Urology, 2012
- Mammography Screening: A New Estimate of Number Needed to Screen to Prevent One Breast Cancer DeathAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2012
- Determining Decision Limits for New Biomarkers: Clinical and Statistical ConsiderationsClinical Chemistry, 2011
- National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Clinical Characteristics and Utilization of Biochemical Markers in Acute Coronary SyndromesCirculation, 2007
- Decision Curve Analysis: A Novel Method for Evaluating Prediction ModelsMedical Decision Making, 2006
- Tumor characteristics and prognostic factors in two subsequent screening rounds with four-year interval within prostate cancer screening trial, ERSPC RotterdamUrology, 2006
- Assessing Prostate Cancer Risk: Results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention TrialJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2006
- Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric ApproachBiometrics, 1988