A phase II trial of talampanel in subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Authors:
- Jeremy ShefnerJSJeremy Shefner
- Amy S. ChappellACAmy S. Chappell
- John S. BjerkeJBJohn S. Bjerke
- Roy TamuraRTRoy Tamura
- Vinay ChaudhryVCVinay Chaudhry
- Lora ClawsonLCLora Clawson
- Lisa HaasLHLisa Haas
- Jeffrey D. RothsteinJRJeffrey D. Rothstein
- 4 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
- Vol. 11 (3) , 266-271
Abstract
Our objective was to determine if chronic treatment with the non-competitive AMPA antagonist talampanel is efficacious and safe in subjects with ALS. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of nine months treatment duration was conducted in 59 subjects with ALS, with 40 subjects receiving talampanel 50 mg p.o. t.i.d, and 19 subjects receiving placebo. Primary outcome measure was rate of decline in isometric arm strength (as measured by change in arm strength megaslope of the Tufts Quantitative Neuromuscular Exam (TQNE)). Other efficacy endpoints included rate of decline in respiratory function, isometric leg strength, bulbar function, fine motor function, the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS), and survival. Secondary safety outcome measures were frequency of adverse events, neurological status, plasma concentration of talampanel, vital signs, routine laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms. Decline in muscle strength was 15% less in talampanel treated subjects, and decline in ALSFRS was 30% slower in talampanel treated subjects. Talampanel was safe in subjects with ALS. Mortality rates (8% talampanel, 5% placebo) and drug discontinuation rates (25% talampanel, 16% placebo) were similar in active treatment and placebo groups. Dizziness and somnolence occurred significantly more often in talampanel treated subjects. Although no efficacy measure reached statistical significance, there was a repeated trend toward slower decline in ALSFRS and isometric muscle strength in talampanel treated subjects. Talampanel was well tolerated in subjects with ALS. Although certain adverse events occurred more frequently in the active treatment group, the rate of subject drop-out after nine months did not exceed that seen in other trials. These findings provide strong support for a phase III trial to determine the efficacy of talampanel in subjects with ALS.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Current hypotheses for the underlying biology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosisAnnals of Neurology, 2009
- Crosstalk between astrocytes and motor neurons: What is the message?Experimental Neurology, 2008
- Protection from fatal viral encephalomyelitis: AMPA receptor antagonists have a direct effect on the inflammatory response to infectionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- β-Lactam antibiotics offer neuroprotection by increasing glutamate transporter expressionNature, 2005
- Altered expression of the glutamate transporter EAAT2b in neurological diseaseAnnals of Neurology, 2004
- A study of riluzole in the treatment of advanced stage or elderly patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosisJournal of Neurology, 2002
- From charcot to lou gehrig: deciphering selective motor neuron death in alsNature Reviews Neuroscience, 2001
- Mutations in the glutamate transporter EAAT2 gene do not cause abnormal EAAT2 transcripts in amyotrophic lateral sclerosisAnnals of Neurology, 1998
- Dose-ranging study of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosisThe Lancet, 1996
- Selective loss of glial glutamate transporter GLT‐1 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosisAnnals of Neurology, 1995