Mechanical properties of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold compared to the metallic everolimus-eluting stent.
Open Access
- 25 May 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
- Vol. 16 (1) , 104
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- First Serial Assessment at 6 Months and 2 Years of the Second Generation of Absorb Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular ScaffoldCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2012
- From metallic cages to transient bioresorbable scaffolds: change in paradigm of coronary revascularization in the upcoming decade?European Heart Journal, 2011
- Delayed Coverage in Malapposed and Side-Branch Struts With Respect to Well-Apposed Struts in Drug-Eluting StentsCirculation, 2011
- Evaluation of the Second Generation of a Bioresorbable Everolimus Drug-Eluting Vascular Scaffold for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery StenosisCirculation, 2010
- TAXUS VI final 5-year results: a multicentre, randomised trial comparing polymer-based moderate-release paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent for treatment of long, complex coronary artery lesionsEuroIntervention, 2009
- Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2007
- Incomplete Stent Apposition and Very Late Stent Thrombosis After Drug-Eluting Stent ImplantationCirculation, 2007
- Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort studyThe Lancet, 2007
- Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Standard Stents in Patients with Stenosis in a Native Coronary ArteryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Exercise-Induced Coronary Artery Vasodilation Is Not Impaired by Stent PlacementCirculation, 2002