A comprehensive MCDM assessment for economic data: success analysis of maximum normalization, CODAS, and fuzzy approaches
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 13 March 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Financial Innovation
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-29
Abstract
The approach of evaluating the final scores of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods according to the strength of association with real-life rankings is interesting for comparing MCDM methods. This approach has recently been applied mostly to financial data. In these studies, where it is emphasized that some methods show more stable success, it would be useful to see the results that will emerge by testing the approach on different data structures more comprehensively. Moreover, not only the final MCDM results but also the performance of normalization techniques and data types (fuzzy or crisp), which are components of MCDM, can be compared using the same approach. These components also have the potential to affect MCDM results directly. In this direction, in our study, the economic performances of G-20 (Group of 20) countries, which have different data structures, were calculated over ten different periodic decision matrices. Ten different crisp-based MCDM methods (COPRAS, CODAS, MOORA, TOPSIS, MABAC, VIKOR (S, R, Q), FUCA, and ELECTRE III) with different capabilities were used to better visualize the big picture. The relationships between two different real-life reference anchors and MCDM methods were used as a basis for comparison. The CODAS method develops a high correlation with both anchors in most periods. The most appropriate normalization technique for CODAS was identified using these two anchors. Interestingly, the maximum normalization technique was the most successful among the alternatives (max, min–max, vector, sum, and alternative ranking-based). Moreover, we compared the two main data types by comparing the correlation results of crisp-based and fuzzy-based CODAS. The results were very consistent, and the “Maximum normalization-based fuzzy integrated CODAS procedure” was proposed to decision-makers to measure the economic performance of the countries.Keywords
This publication has 91 references indexed in Scilit:
- A novel fuzzy‐based structured framework for sustainable operation and environmental friendly production in coal‐fired power industryInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2021
- Turkey and Some EU Countries’ Economic Performance Analysis with Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: Promethee GAIA Application2020
- Assessing Euro 2020 Strategy Using Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: VIKOR and TOPSISSocial Indicators Research, 2018
- Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromeArtificial Intelligence Review, 2016
- Human Development and Quality of Institutions in Highly Developed Countries2016
- Minimizing the Compensatory Effect of MCDM Group Decision Additive Aggregation Using the Veto Concept2013
- Economic Growth and Sustainable Development: Could Multicriteria Analysis be used to Solve this Dichotomy?Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2006
- Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study2000
- Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: A comparison of European and non-European countriesEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 1995
- A Mathematical Theory of CommunicationBell System Technical Journal, 1948