COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey
Open Access
- 21 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Public Health
- Vol. 9, 700769
Abstract
Objective:To describe the utility and patterns of COVID-19 simulation scenarios across different international healthcare centers.Methods:This is a cross-sectional, international survey for multiple simulation centers team members, including team-leaders and healthcare workers (HCWs), based on each center's debriefing reports from 30 countries in all WHO regions. The main outcome measures were the COVID-19 simulations characteristics, facilitators, obstacles, and challenges encountered during the simulation sessions.Results:Invitation was sent to 343 simulation team leaders and multidisciplinary HCWs who responded; 121 completed the survey. The frequency of simulation sessions was monthly (27.1%), weekly (24.8%), twice weekly (19.8%), or daily (21.5%). Regarding the themes of the simulation sessions, they were COVID-19 patient arrival to ER (69.4%), COVID-19 patient intubation due to respiratory failure (66.1%), COVID-19 patient requiring CPR (53.7%), COVID-19 transport inside the hospital (53.7%), COVID-19 elective intubation in OR (37.2%), or Delivery of COVID-19 mother and neonatal care (19%). Among participants, 55.6% reported the team's full engagement in the simulation sessions. The average session length was 30–60 min. The debriefing process was conducted by the ICU facilitator in (51%) of the sessions followed by simulation staff in 41% of the sessions. A total of 80% reported significant improvement in clinical preparedness after simulation sessions, and 70% were satisfied with the COVID-19 sessions. Most perceived issues reported were related to infection control measures, followed by team dynamics, logistics, and patient transport issues.Conclusion:Simulation centers team leaders and HCWs reported positive feedback on COVID-19 simulation sessions with multidisciplinary personnel involvement. These drills are a valuable tool for rehearsing safe dynamics on the frontline of COVID-19. More research on COVID-19 simulation outcomes is warranted; to explore variable factors for each country and healthcare system.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Status of simulation in health care education: an international surveyAdvances in Medical Education and Practice, 2014
- Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82Medical Teacher, 2013
- Spreading human factors expertise in healthcare: untangling the knots in people and systemsBMJ Quality & Safety, 2013
- In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency departmentBMJ Quality & Safety, 2012
- Simulation-based mock codes significantly correlate with improved pediatric patient cardiopulmonary arrest survival rates*Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2011
- Recommendations for intensive care unit and hospital preparations for an influenza epidemic or mass disaster: summary report of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine’s Task Force for intensive care unit triage during an influenza epidemic or mass disasterIntensive Care Medicine, 2010
- Simulation at the point of care: Reduced-cost, in situ training via a mobile cartPediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2009
- An evaluation of simulated clinical practice for adult branch studentsNursing Standard, 2009
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2007
- Simulation Training for a Mass Casualty Incident: Two-Year Experience at the Army Trauma Training Center2006