Breast Cancer Survivors and Healthy Women: Could Gut Microbiota Make a Difference?—“BiotaCancerSurvivors”: A Case-Control Study
Authors:
- Telma CaleçaTCTelma Caleça
- Pedro RibeiroPRPedro Ribeiro
- Marina VitorinoMVMarina Vitorino
- Maria MenezesMMMaria Menezes
- Mafalda Sampaio-AlvesMSMafalda Sampaio-Alves
- Ana Duarte MendesAna Duarte Mendes
- Rodrigo VicenteRVRodrigo Vicente
- Ida NegreirosINIda Negreiros
- Ana FariaAFAna Faria
- Diogo Alpuim CostaDiogo Alpuim Costa
Open Access
Abstract
In this first analysis, samples from 23 BC survivors (group 1) and 291 healthy female controls (group 2) were characterised through the V3 and V4 regions that encode the “16S rRNA” gene of each bacteria. The samples were sequenced by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the taxonomy was identified by resorting to Kraken2 and improved with Bracken, using a curated database called ‘GutHealth_DB’. The α and β-diversity analyses were used to determine the richness and evenness of the gut microbiota. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was applied to assess differential abundance between both groups. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio was calculated using a Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared test. The α-diversity was significantly higher in group 1 (p = 0.28 × 10−12 for the Chao index and p = 1.64 × 10−12 for the ACE index). The Shannon index, a marker of richness and evenness, was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.72). The microbiota composition was different between the two groups: a null hypothesis was rejected for PERMANOVA (p = 9.99 × 10−5) and Anosim (p = 0.04) and was not rejected for β-dispersion (p = 0.158), using Unifrac weighted distance. The relative abundance of 14 phyla, 29 classes, 25 orders, 64 families, 116 genera, and 74 species differed significantly between both groups. The F/B ratio was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2, p < 0.001. Our study allowed us to observe significant taxonomic disparities in the two groups by testing the differences between BC survivors and healthy controls. Additional studies are needed to clarify the involved mechanisms and explore the relationship between microbiota and BC survivorship.Keywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fecal microbial determinants of fecal and systemic estrogens and estrogen metabolites: a cross-sectional studyJournal of Translational Medicine, 2012
- Predictions of survival up to 10 years after diagnosis for European women with breast cancer in 2000–2002International Journal of Cancer, 2012
- Colonic microbiome is altered in alcoholismAmerican Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 2012
- Quality of Life, Fertility Concerns, and Behavioral Health Outcomes in Younger Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic ReviewJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2012
- Microbiome and MalignancyCell Host & Microbe, 2011
- A Nurse-Led Telephone Session and Quality of Life after Radiotherapy Among Women with Breast Cancer: A Randomized TrialThe Open Nursing Journal, 2011
- Composition, variability, and temporal stability of the intestinal microbiota of the elderlyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010
- Human gut microbiota in obesity and after gastric bypassProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Human colonic microbiota associated with diet, obesity and weight lossInternational Journal of Obesity, 2008
- Human gut microbes associated with obesityNature, 2006