American Sign Language as a Pathway to Linguistic Competence
Author:
- 1 April 1998
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Exceptional Children
- Vol. 64 (3) , 329-342
Abstract
Recently, it has been argued that American Sign Language (ASL) should be the first language of some deaf children and that English should be taught as a second language. This article supports that argument on both philosophical and empirical grounds. Philosophical support stems from viewing deafness as a cultural difference rather than as a medical disability. Empirical evidence demonstrates that (a) ASL is a natural language, (b) deaf children acquire ASL in a normal and predictable manner when exposure occurs at an early age, and (c) deaf children who acquire ASL at an early age may outperform other deaf children on all measures of academic achievement. Based on the empirical evidence presented, implications for educational practice are provided.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Symbolic Gesture versus Word: Is There a Modality Advantage for Onset of Symbol Use?Child Development, 1993
- Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change.Developmental Psychology, 1988
- A precursor of language acquisition in young infantsCognition, 1988
- Grammatical theory and signed languages1988
- Constraints on learning and their role in language acquisition: Studies of the acquisition of American sign languageLanguage Sciences, 1988
- The synergy of sign and speech in simultaneous communicationApplied Psycholinguistics, 1985
- Developmental Aspects of Cross-Language Speech PerceptionChild Development, 1981
- Space, Time, and Person Reference in American Sign LanguageLanguage, 1975
- English as the second language of deaf children.Developmental Psychology, 1974
- Psycholinguistic and Educational Implications of DeafnessHuman Development, 1973