Abdominal Wall Stability and Flap Complications after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
Authors:
- Oscar OchoaOOOscar Ochoa
- Minas ChrysopouloMCMinas Chrysopoulo
- Chet NastalaCNChet Nastala
- Peter LedouxPLPeter Ledoux
- Steven PisanoSPSteven Pisano
- 1 July 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 130 (1) , 21e-33e
Abstract
Background: Promoted by reports of decreased donor-site morbidity, deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps have gained significant popularity. Increasing body mass index is associated with poor outcomes in breast reconstruction using traditional techniques. The authors aimed to define complications with increasing body mass index among patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 639 DIEP flaps in 418 patients was performed. Patients were stratified into five groups based on body mass index. Data regarding medical comorbidities, adjuvant therapies, timing of reconstruction, active tobacco use, and surgical history were collected. Primary outcomes were compared among groups. Results: The average body mass index for the entire population was 28.3 (range, 17 to 42). Increasing body mass index was associated with increased incidence of hypertension, previous abdominal operations, and length of follow-up. Flap complications stratified by group demonstrated significantly increased delayed wound healing complications in severely obese patients compared with lower body mass index groups. Donor-site complications stratified by body mass index demonstrated significantly increased delayed wound healing and overall complications among morbidly obese patients compared with other groups. Incidence of abdominal wall bulging and hernia formation was not significantly different among groups. Conclusions: Increasing body mass index predisposes patients to delayed wound healing complications in both flap and donor-site locations. Nevertheless, overall flap complications remain similar across all body mass index groups. Abdominal wall stability was maintained. Given a similar flap complication profile and maintenance of abdominal stability, DIEP flaps are recommended in patients with increased body mass index. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVDENCE: Risk, II.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Morbidity of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Comorbid ConditionsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2011
- The Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap: Myth and RealityPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2010
- Complications Associated With Breast Reconstruction Using a Perforator Flap Compared With a Free TRAM FlapAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2006
- Ten years’ experience of free flaps for breast reconstruction in a Danish microsurgical centre: An auditScandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 2006
- Contour Abnormalities of the Abdomen after Breast Reconstruction with Abdominal FlapsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2002
- Fat Necrosis in Free Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous and Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator FlapsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2000
- TRAM Flap Anatomy Correlated with a 10-Year Clinical Experience with 556 PatientsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1995
- A Critical Review of 300 PatientsAnnals of Surgery, 1987
- The Transverse Abdominal Island Flap: Part I. Indications; Contraindications, Results, and ComplicationsAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 1983
- Breast Reconstruction with a Transverse Abdominal Island FlapPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1982