Comparison between surrogate indexes of insulin sensitivity/resistance and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp estimates in rats
Authors:
- 1 November 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Vol. 297 (5) , E1023-E1029
Abstract
Assessing insulin resistance in rodent models gives insight into mechanisms that cause type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. The hyperinsulinemic euglycemic glucose clamp, the reference standard for measuring insulin sensitivity in humans and animals, is labor intensive and technically demanding. A number of simple surrogate indexes of insulin sensitivity/resistance have been developed and validated primarily for use in large human studies. These same surrogates are also frequently used in rodent studies. However, in general, these indexes have not been rigorously evaluated in animals. In a recent validation study in mice, we demonstrated that surrogates have a weaker correlation with glucose clamp estimates of insulin sensitivity/resistance than in humans. This may be due to increased technical difficulties in mice and/or intrinsic differences between human and rodent physiology. To help distinguish among these possibilities, in the present study, using data from rats substantially larger than mice, we compared the clamp glucose infusion rate (GIR) with surrogate indexes, including QUICKI, HOMA, 1/HOMA, log (HOMA), and 1/fasting insulin. All surrogates were modestly correlated with GIR (r = 0.34–0.40). Calibration analyses of surrogates adjusted for body weight demonstrated similar predictive accuracy for GIR among all surrogates. We conclude that linear correlations of surrogate indexes with clamp estimates and predictive accuracy of surrogate indexes in rats are similar to those in mice (but not as substantial as in humans). This additional rat study (taken with the previous mouse study) suggests that application of surrogate insulin sensitivity indexes developed for humans may not be appropriate for determining primary outcomes in rodent studies due to intrinsic differences in metabolic physiology. However, use of surrogates may be appropriate in rodents, where feasibility of clamps is an obstacle and measurement of insulin sensitivity is a secondary outcome.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Central and Opposing Effects of IGF-I and IGF-Binding Protein-3 on Systemic Insulin ActionDiabetes, 2006
- Comparison of the Insulin Action Parameters from Hyperinsulinemic Clamps with Homeostasis Model Assessment and QUICKI Indexes in Subjects with Different Endocrine DisordersThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2004
- Methods for clinical assessment of insulin sensitivity and β-cell functionBest Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2003
- Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index and the Reciprocal Index of Homeostasis Model Assessment in Normal Range Weight and Moderately Obese Type 2 Diabetic PatientsDiabetes Care, 2003
- QUICKI is a useful index of insulin sensitivity in subjects with hypertensionAmerican Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2003
- Removal of Visceral Fat Prevents Insulin Resistance and Glucose Intolerance of AgingDiabetes, 2002
- Diet-induced insulin resistance in mice lacking adiponectin/ACRP30Nature Medicine, 2002
- Repeatability Characteristics of Simple Indices of Insulin Resistance: Implications for Research ApplicationsThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2001
- Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index: A Simple, Accurate Method for Assessing Insulin Sensitivity In HumansThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2000
- Aging does not contribute to the decline in insulin action on storage of muscle glycogen in ratsAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 2000