Historical Aspects of the Calaveras Skull Controversy
Author:
- Ralph W. DexterRDRalph W. Dexter
- 1 April 1986
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 51 (2) , 365-369
Abstract
In February 1866, workers found a human skull deep in a mine in Calaveras County, California, believed at first to be of Pliocene age. It was passed through several hands before reaching J. D. Whitney, State Geologist of California and Professor of Geology at Harvard University. While some scientists accepted it on face value, other scientists and the public press refused to believe it and even ridiculed the claim. Some believed it was a “plant,” while others had faith in the reports of the miners, which led to a long controversy. Apparently two skulls became confused in transmission from one person to another, but in the end they were identified as fossilized Indian skulls of modern type, and it was finally admitted that the one taken from the mine was “planted” as a joke.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Man's Discovery of His Past: Literary Landmarks in Archaeology.American Sociological Review, 1963
- The Pliocene Skull of California and the Flint Implements of Table MountainThe Journal of Geology, 1899
- PRELIMINARY REVISION OF THE EVIDENCE RELATING TO AURIFEROUS GRAVEL MAN IN CALIFORNIAAmerican Anthropologist, 1899
- Antiquities from Under Tuolumne Table Mountain in CaliforniaGeological Society of America Bulletin, 1891