Breaking up is Hard to Do: The Heartbreak of Dichotomizing Continuous Data
Open Access
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 47 (3) , 262-266
Abstract
Researchers often take variables that are measured on a continuum and then break them into categories (for example, above or below some cut-point), either to place subjects into groups or as an outcome measure. In this article, we show that the rationales given for this practice are weak and that categorization results in lost information, reduced power of statistical tests, and increased probability of a Type II error. Dichotomizing a continuous variable is justified only when the distribution of that variable is highly skewed or its relation with another variable is nonlinear.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Nefazodone, the Cognitive Behavioral-Analysis System of Psychotherapy, and Their Combination for the Treatment of Chronic DepressionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Guidelines for the management of hypertension: the world Health organisation/International society of Hypertension ViewJournal Of Hypertension, 1995
- Categorical distinctions in the study of personality disorder: Implications for classification.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1994
- A Checklist for Evaluating the Usefulness of Rating ScalesThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1993
- Binary methods for continuous outcomes: A parametric alternativeJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Dichotomization of continuous variables: The implications for meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990
- The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures.Psychological Bulletin, 1989