Effect of Genotype and Microbial Inoculants on Quality, Fermentation, and In Vitro Digestibility of Barley at Early Dough Stage of Maturity
Open Access
- 12 August 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Fermentation
- Vol. 12 (8) , 382
Abstract
A 2 × 2 × 2 factorial experiment was conducted to study the individual and combined effects of barley variety (Tarım 92 and Bravo), homofermentative inoculant (HMF; Lactobacillus plantarum and Enterococcus faecium), and heterofermentative inoculant (HTF; Lactobacillus buchneri) on the fermentation characteristics, chemical composition, nutritive value indices, and in vitro digestibility of whole-crop barley silages which were harvested at the early dough stage. Forty-eight laboratory silos (six replicates per treatment) were ensiled for 120 days. Tarım 92 silage exhibited superior fermentation stability across all treatments, with pH ranging from 4.11 to 4.30, Flieg points of 102.94–115.47, and lower NH3-N concentrations (142.01–173.72 mg/kg TN (total nitrogen)), reflecting better protein preservation than Bravo silage. In contrast, the poorest fermentation outcome (pH 5.24; Flieg 47.06; NH3-N 307.48 mg/kg TN) was exhibited by the Bravo silage inoculated with only homofermentative inoculants. Significant three-way interaction effects were detected among barley variety, homofermentative inoculant, and heterofermentative inoculant (p < 0.05). The dual-inoculated Tarım 92 silage showed the optimum in vitro digestibility and nutritional value (TDN 77.14%; NEL 1.81 Mcal kg−1 DM; RFV 176.25; ADF 18.75%; IVOMD 65.72%; predicted DMI 3.06% BW), while higher amounts of butyric acid and NH3-N suggested that better nutritional value was not always accompanied by better protein preservation. The combined inoculation also yielded the best outcomes within Bravo treatments (RFV 144.00), whereas HTF inoculation alone reduced IVDMD and IVOMD below uninoculated controls. Overall, these results show that the response to microbial inoculation is genotype-dependent and a combination of homofermentative and heterofermentative inoculation for high-dry-matter barley varieties can enhance nutritive value and digestibility. However, fermentation quality indicators, particularly butyric acid and NH3-N, require consideration in the selection of technique.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nutritive value for high-yielding lactating cows of barley silage and hay as a substitute for wheat silage and hay in low-roughage dietsAnimal Feed Science and Technology, 2020
- Effect of stage of growth on the chemical composition, nutritive value and ensilability of whole-crop barleyAnimal Feed Science and Technology, 2009
- Utilisation by ruminants of nitrogen compounds in silage-based dietsAnimal Feed Science and Technology, 2004
- The role of Lactobacillus buchneri in forage preservationTrends in Biotechnology, 2003
- Ensiling whole-crop wheat and corn in large containers with Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus buchneriJournal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2002
- Incorporation of [ 15 N]Ammonia by the Cellulolytic Ruminal Bacteria Fibrobacter succinogenes BL2, Ruminococcus albus SY3, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens 17Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2001
- The impact of the quality of silage on animal health and food safety: A reviewVeterinary Quarterly, 2000
- New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silageFEMS Microbiology Reviews, 1996
- Analysis of adaptation of barley, triticale, durum and bread wheat under Mediterranean conditionsEuphytica, 1992
- The effectiveness of silage inoculants: A systems approachAgricultural Systems, 1987